Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37947940›Full record

SynthesisJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2024

Biomarkers Assessing the Role of Cumulus Cells on IVF Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Gaelle Massoud, Marcus Spann, Kamaria Cayton Vaught, Samarjit Das, Mark Dow, Richard Cochran, Valerie Baker, James Segars, Bhuchitra Singh

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Female Aging Affects Coilin Pattern in Mouse Cumulus Cells.Journal of developmental biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Expression ofInternational journal of reproductive biomedicine · 2025
    Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Fluid biopsies forMedicine international
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gaelle MassoudDivision of Reproductive Sciences & Women's Health Research, Department of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 720 Rutland Avenue, Ross Research Building, Room 624, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Marcus SpannInformationist Services, Welch Medical Library, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Kamaria Cayton VaughtDivision of Reproductive Sciences & Women's Health Research, Department of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 720 Rutland Avenue, Ross Research Building, Room 624, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Samarjit DasDepartment of Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Mark DowDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Richard CochranDivision of Reproductive Sciences & Women's Health Research, Department of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 720 Rutland Avenue, Ross Research Building, Room 624, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Valerie BakerDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
James SegarsDivision of Reproductive Sciences & Women's Health Research, Department of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 720 Rutland Avenue, Ross Research Building, Room 624, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Bhuchitra SinghDivision of Reproductive Sciences & Women's Health Research, Department of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 720 Rutland Avenue, Ross Research Building, Room 624, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. bsingh10@jhmi.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2113-4345
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Johns Hopkins Women's Reproductive Health Research Career Development ProgramK12HD103036 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SATIN, ANDREW J. · 2020 to 2024
$1.5M
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD103036NICHD NIH HHS L50 HD110023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAlthough significant improvements in assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes have been accomplished, a critical question remains: which embryo is most likely to result in a pregnancy? Embryo selection is currently based on morphological and genetic criteria; however, these criteria do not fully predict good-quality embryos and additional objective criteria are needed. The cumulus cells are critical for oocyte and embryo development. This systematic review assessed biomarkers in cumulus-oocyte complexes and their association with successful IVF outcomes.

methodsA comprehensive search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception until November 2022. Only English-language publications were included. Inclusion criteria consisted of papers that evaluated genetic biomarkers associated with the cumulus cells (CCs) in humans and the following three outcomes of interest: oocyte quality, embryo quality, and clinical outcomes, including fertilization, implantation, pregnancy, and live birth rates.

resultsThe search revealed 446 studies of which 42 met eligibility criteria. Nineteen studies correlated genetic and biochemical biomarkers in CCs with oocyte quality. A positive correlation was reported between oocyte quality and increased mRNA expression in CCs of genes encoding for calcium homeostasis (CAMK1D), glucose metabolism (PFKP), extracellular matrix (HAS2, VCAN), TGF-β family (GDF9, BMP15), and prostaglandin synthesis (PTGS2). Nineteen studies correlated genetic and biochemical biomarkers in CCs with embryo quality. A positive correlation was reported between embryo quality and increased mRNA expression in CCs of genes encoding for extracellular matrix (HAS2), prostaglandin synthesis (PTGS2), steroidogenesis (GREM1), and decreased expression of gene encoding for hormone receptor (AMHR2). Twenty-two studies assessed genetic and biochemical biomarkers in CCs with clinical outcomes. Increased expression of genes encoding for extracellular matrix (VCAN), and TGF-β family (GDF9, BMP15) were positively correlated with pregnancy rate.

conclusionGenetic biomarkers from cumulus cells were associated with oocyte quality (CAMK1D, PFKP, HAS2, VCAN, GDF-9, BMP-15, PTGS2), embryo quality (GREM1, PTGS2, HAS2), and pregnancy rate (GDF9, BMP15, VCAN). These results might help guide future studies directed at tests of cumulus cells to devise objective criteria to predict IVF outcomes.

Indexed as

Cumulus CellsOocytesCyclooxygenase 2FemaleFertilization in VitroGenetic MarkersHumansPregnancyProstaglandinsReproductive Techniques, AssistedRNA, MessengerTransforming Growth Factor betaCyclooxygenase 2Genetic MarkersProstaglandinsRNA, MessengerTransforming Growth Factor betaBiomarkersCumulus cellsCumulus-oocyte complexEmbryo qualityIVF outcomesOocyte quality

Identifiers

PMID37947940
PMCPMC10894783
OpenAlexW4388571145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.