ArticleJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2024
Expansion of platform physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model for monoclonal antibodies towards different preclinical species: cats, sheep, and dogs.
Article in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are becoming an important therapeutic option in veterinary medicine, and understanding the pharmacokinetic (PK) of mAbs in higher-order animal species is also important for human drug development. To better understand the PK of mAbs in these animals, here we have expanded a platform physiological-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to characterize the disposition of mAbs in three different preclinical species: cats, sheep, and dogs. We obtained PK data for mAbs and physiological parameters for the three different species from the literature. We were able to describe the PK of mAbs following intravenous (IV) or subcutaneous administration in cats, IV administration in sheep, and IV administration dogs reasonably well by fixing the physiological parameters and just estimating the parameters related to the binding of mAbs to the neonatal Fc receptor. The platform PBPK model presented here provides a quantitative tool to predict the plasma PK of mAbs in dogs, cats, and sheep. The model can also predict mAb PK in different tissues where the site of action might be located. As such, the mAb PBPK model presented here can facilitate the discovery, development, and preclinical-to-clinical translation of mAbs for veterinary and human medicine. The model can also be modified in the future to account for more detailed compartments for certain organs, different pathophysiology in the animals, and target-mediated drug disposition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37947924What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.