Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37947880›Full record

ReviewEJNMMI research2023

An update on the use of image-derived input functions for human PET studies: new hopes or old illusions?

Tommaso Volpi, Lucia Maccioni, Maria Colpo, Giulia Debiasi, Amedeo Capotosti, Tommaso Ciceri, Richard E Carson, Christine DeLorenzo, Andreas Hahn, Gitte Moos Knudsen and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EJNMMI research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
13.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. First Experience with [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Applications of artificial intelligence in nuclear medicine.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Task-evoked deactivations: dissociation between BOLD fMRI and FDG.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  9. "Pseudo-reference-based Input Function Shape" (pRef-IFS): Towards a True image-derived input function for PET kinetic modeling.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Feasibility of shortening theQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026
    Article
  15. Eagle eyes on the human brain and beyond: PET at ultra-high spatial resolution.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Developing a novel reference region for [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Lower Extremity Flow Quantification Using DynamicIEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 10 institutions in 7 countries.

Tommaso VolpiDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, 801 Howard Avenue, PO Box 208048, New Haven, CT, 06520-8048, USA. tommaso.volpi@yale.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5451-6710
Lucia MaccioniDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Maria ColpoDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Giulia DebiasiDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Amedeo CapotostiDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Tommaso CiceriDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Richard E CarsonDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, 801 Howard Avenue, PO Box 208048, New Haven, CT, 06520-8048, USA.
Christine DeLorenzoRenaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Andreas HahnDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Healthy (C3NMH), Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Gitte Moos KnudsenNeurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Adriaan A LammertsmaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Julie C PriceAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
Vesna SossiDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Guobao WangDepartment of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Paolo Zanotti-FregonaraMolecular Imaging Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Alessandra BertoldoDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Mattia VeroneseDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
University of Padua · ITYale University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USMedical University of Vienna · ATNational Institute of Mental Health · USStony Brook School · USUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of California Davis Medical Center · USUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Clinical Evaluation of PET RadiotracersZIAMH002852 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI INNIS, ROBERT · 2009 to 2025
$48.6M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002852NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIMH NIH HHS ZIA-MH002852
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe need for arterial blood data in quantitative PET research limits the wider usability of this imaging method in clinical research settings. Image-derived input function (IDIF) approaches have been proposed as a cost-effective and non-invasive alternative to gold-standard arterial sampling. However, this approach comes with its own limitations-partial volume effects and radiometabolite correction among the most important-and varying rates of success, and the use of IDIF for brain PET has been particularly troublesome. MAIN BODY: This paper summarizes the limitations of IDIF methods for quantitative PET imaging and discusses some of the advances that may make IDIF extraction more reliable. The introduction of automated pipelines (both commercial and open-source) for clinical PET scanners is discussed as a way to improve the reliability of IDIF approaches and their utility for quantitative purposes. Survey data gathered from the PET community are then presented to understand whether the field's opinion of the usefulness and validity of IDIF is improving. Finally, as the introduction of next-generation PET scanners with long axial fields of view, ultra-high sensitivity, and improved spatial and temporal resolution, has also brought IDIF methods back into the spotlight, a discussion of the possibilities offered by these state-of-the-art scanners-inclusion of large vessels, less partial volume in small vessels, better description of the full IDIF kinetics, whole-body modeling of radiometabolite production-is included, providing a pathway for future use of IDIF.

conclusionImprovements in PET scanner technology and software for automated IDIF extraction may allow to solve some of the major limitations associated with IDIF, such as partial volume effects and poor temporal sampling, with the exciting potential for accurate estimation of single kinetic rates. Nevertheless, until individualized radiometabolite correction can be performed effectively, IDIF approaches remain confined at best to a few tracers.

Indexed as

Blood samplingHigh sensitivityImage-derived input functionLong axial field of viewTotal-body PET

Identifiers

PMID37947880
PMCPMC10638226
OpenAlexW4388564409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.