ArticleRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2023
The overlooked symptom of coccydynia: evaluation of sacrococcygeal morphologic and morphometric findings.
Article in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Management of coccygodynia: talking points from a systematic review of recent clinical trials.Annals of joint · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCoccydynia is one of the most overlooked symptoms in daily clinical practice. Definitions for radiologic evaluation are controversial.
objectivesWe aimed to compare the morphology and morphometric measurements of the sacrococcygeal region with those of a healthy population to support radiologic decision-making. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn total, 26 traumatic and 50 idiopathic cases of coccydynia as well as 74 healthy control cases were retrospectively compared. The morphologic type of the coccyx, the presence of fusion, and the number of coccygeal segments were evaluated in both groups. Morphometric parameters such as sacrococcygeal angle (SCA), sacrococcygeal joint angle (SCJA), intercoccygeal angle (ICA), sacral slope (SS), coccyx curved length (CCL), sacrum curved length (SCL), coccyx length (CL), sacrum length (SL), and sacrococcygeal total length (SCTL) were investigated.
resultsSignificant differences were found between the coccydynia group and the healthy control group in morphologic parameters such as female gender, coccyx segment, coccyx morphology, presence of sacrococcygeal joint, and segment of sacrococcygeal joint fusion (p < 0.05). In morphologic measurements, SCJA, SCL, SL, coccyx and sacrum curvature indexes were significantly increased (p < 0.05). No significant difference was found in the morphologic and morphometric parameters evaluated when compared with the duration of coccydynia (p > 0.05).
conclusionAn increase in the SCJA, SCL, SL, SCI, and coccyx curvature index measurements predisposes to coccydynia. It would be more accurate to perform radiological evaluation by familiarization with these morphologic and morphometric parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37947861What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.