ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2024
The inferior performance of [
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- FAPI: a solution to all, what about NENs?EJNMMI reports · 2026Review
- Radiolabelled FAPI Radiotracers in Oncology: A Comprehensive Review of Current Diagnostic and Emerging Therapeutic Applications.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Review
- An overview of the role of radionuclides in targeted cancer treatment: application of biomarkers for patient selection and developments to improve treatment efficacy.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Diagnostic Performances of PET/CT Using Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors in Patients with Primary and Metastatic Liver Tumors: A Comprehensive Literature Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe aimed to investigate the potential of [
methodsPatients who received at least two cycles of [
resultsTwelve patients (7 male, 5 female) who met the eligibility criteria were included in the study. Ten patients had grade 1-2 NET of various origins, and two had paraganglioma and pheochromocytoma. One hundred ninety-eight of 230 lesions (86%) were SSTR positive with a median SUVmax of 16.6 (2.2-76.5), and 88 of 230 lesions (38.2%) were [
conclusionOur preliminary results demonstrated that [
Indexed as
Identifiers
37947850What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.