Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37947800›Full record

ArticleChirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024

[Inpatient surgical treatment in mass casualty situations and disasters-Current treatment capacities depending on alarm status of the hospital and treatment concept].

Axel Franke, Wolfgang Lehmann, Thomas Wurmb

Open access · hybridAbstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Axel FrankeSektion Unfallchirurgie, Klinik für Unfallchirurgie, Orthopädie, Hand- und Rekonstruktive Chirurgie, Verbrennungsmedizin, BundeswehrZentralkrankenhaus Koblenz, Rübenacher Str. 170, 56072, Koblenz, Deutschland. dr.axel.franke@t-online.de.
Wolfgang LehmannKlinik für Unfallchirurgie, Orthopädie und Plastische Chirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37099, Göttingen, Deutschland.
Thomas WurmbKlinik und Poliklinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Sektion Notfall- und Katastrophenmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland.
Bundeswehrzentralkrankenhaus Koblenz · DEUniversitätsklinikum Würzburg · DEUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe functionality and treatment capacity of hospitals are decisive components to safeguard the in-hospital treatment of patients in crises and catastrophes. This is shown by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic and the war in Ukraine. The aim of this study is the elicitation of treatment capacities of hospitals in the trauma network of the German Society for Trauma Surgery (DGU) assuming a damage situation with a multitude of trauma patients needing treatment. MATERIAL AND

methodThe 622 hospitals in the trauma network were surveyed to elicit the current treatment capacities depending on the principles and standards of treatment. For this purpose, a questionnaire for voluntary participation in the survey was placed online via the Academy of Trauma Surgery (AUC) of the DGU and an electronic platform (SurveyMonkey). The data presented in this article represent an extract of the total data focussed on the issues involved in the study.

resultsA total of 252 of the 622 hospitals certified in December 2022 (40%) participated in the survey and 250 datasets could be utilized. Local, regional and supraregional trauma centers were equally represented. Using a tactical abbreviated surgical control (TASC) focussed on survival, the treatment capacities in the individual triage categories could be increased with respect to the scenarios in question. It was also clear that the availability of teams skilled in the surgical treatment of body cavity injuries still represents a challenge.

conclusionThe results of the survey demonstrate the extent to which treatment capacities for the care of injured and wounded patients are currently available in the hospitals of the DGU trauma network and to what extent they can be increased. In this way, due the dynamics a mass casualty incident can initially lead locally and temporarily to a decompensated crisis management. The aim of all efforts and preparations must therefore be to durably strengthen hospitals so that this can be avoided as reliably as possible and to include these considerations in the hospital structural reform.

Indexed as

Disaster PlanningMass Casualty IncidentsHospitalsHumansInpatientsTriageBody cavity injuriesCertificationCompensated crisis careHealthcare systemTrauma centers

Identifiers

PMID37947800
PMCPMC10781816
OpenAlexW4388573898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.