Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37947575›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

From Threatening Chaos to Temporary Order through a Complex Process of Adaptation: A Grounded Theory Study of the Escalation of Intensive Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Camilla Göras, Malin Lohela-Karlsson, Markus Castegren, Emelie Condén Mellgren, Mirjam Ekstedt, Petronella Bjurling-Sjöberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The intersection between logical empiricism and qualitative nursing research: a post-structuralist analysis.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Camilla GörasDepartment of Caring Sciences, Faculty of Health and Occupational Sciences, University of Gävle, SE-801 76 Gävle, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0883-4072
Malin Lohela-KarlssonDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Health Services Research, Uppsala University, SE-752 37 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9376-846X
Markus CastegrenDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9292-0298
Emelie Condén MellgrenCentre for Clinical Research Västmanland, Uppsala University, SE-721 89 Västerås, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4525-1623
Mirjam EkstedtDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, Linnaeus University Kalmar/Växjö, SE-392 31 Kalmar, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4108-391X
Petronella Bjurling-SjöbergCentre for Clinical Research Sörmland, Uppsala University, SE-631 88 Eskilstuna, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0245-3057
Uppsala University · SEFalun Hospital · SELinnaeus University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To ensure high-quality care, operationalize resilience and fill the knowledge gap regarding how to improve the prerequisites for resilient performance, it is necessary to understand how adaptive capacity unfolds in practice. The main aim of this research was to explain the escalation process of intensive care during the first wave of the pandemic from a microlevel perspective, including expressions of resilient performance, intervening conditions at the micro-meso-macrolevels and short- and long-term consequences. A secondary aim was to provide recommendations regarding how to optimize the prerequisites for resilient performance in intensive care. A grounded theory methodology was used. First-person stories from different healthcare professionals (n70) in two Swedish regions were analyzed using the constant comparative method. This resulted in a novel conceptual model (including 6 main categories and 24 subcategories), and 41 recommendations. The conclusion of these findings is that the escalation of intensive care can be conceptualized as a transition from threatening chaos to temporary order through a complex process of adaptation. To prepare for the future, the components of space, stuff, staff, system and science, with associated continuity plans, must be implemented, anchored and communicated to actors at all levels of the system.

Indexed as

COVID-19Critical CareGrounded TheoryHealth PersonnelHumansPandemicsadaptive capacityCOVID-19grounded theoryhealthcareintensive careresilienceresilient performancesurge responseunexpected crises

Identifiers

PMID37947575
PMCPMC10649734
OpenAlexW4388288776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.