Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37947574›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Utilizing User Preferences in Designing the AGILE (Accelerating Access to Gender-Based Violence Information and Services Leveraging on Technology Enhanced) Chatbot.

Anne Ngũnjiri, Peter Memiah, Robert Kimathi, Fernando A Wagner, Annrita Ikahu, Eunice Omanga, Emmanuel Kweyu, Carol Ngunu, Lilian Otiso

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Anne NgũnjiriLVCT Health Kenya, Nairobi P.O. Box 19835-00202, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0001-6893-9047
Peter MemiahGraduate School, University of Maryland, 620 W. Lexington Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Robert KimathiLVCT Health Kenya, Nairobi P.O. Box 19835-00202, Kenya.
Fernando A WagnerSchool of Social Work, University of Maryland, 525 W. Redwood Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Annrita IkahuLVCT Health Kenya, Nairobi P.O. Box 19835-00202, Kenya.
Eunice OmangaLVCT Health Kenya, Nairobi P.O. Box 19835-00202, Kenya.
Emmanuel KweyuFaculty of Information Technology, Strathmore University, Nairobi P.O. Box 59857-00200, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0001-8493-1184
Carol NgunuDepartment of Health, Nairobi City County, Nairobi P.O. Box 30075-00100, Kenya.
Lilian OtisoLVCT Health Kenya, Nairobi P.O. Box 19835-00202, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0003-0164-154X
LVCT Health · KEUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USStrathmore University · KEUniversity of Nairobi · KE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTechnology advancements have enhanced artificial intelligence, leading to a user shift towards virtual assistants, but a human-centered approach is needed to assess for acceptability and effectiveness. The AGILE chatbot is designed in Kenya with features to redefine the response towards gender-based violence (GBV) among vulnerable populations, including adolescents, young women and men, and sexual and gender minorities, to offer accurate and reliable information among users.

methodsWe conducted an exploratory qualitative study through focus group discussions (FGDs) targeting 150 participants sampled from vulnerable categories; adolescent girls and boys, young women, young men, and sexual and gender minorities. The FGDs included multiple inquiries to assess knowledge and prior interaction with intelligent conversational assistants to inform the user-centric development of a decision-supportive chatbot and a pilot of the chatbot prototype. Each focus group comprised 9-10 members, and the discussions lasted about two hours to gain qualitative user insights and experiences. We used thematic analysis and drew on grounded theory to analyze the data.

resultsThe analysis resulted in 14 salient themes composed of sexual violence, physical violence, emotional violence, intimate partner violence, female genital mutilation, sexual reproductive health, mental health, help-seeking behaviors/where to seek support, who to talk to, and what information they would like, features of the chatbot, access of chatbot, abuse and HIV, family and community conflicts, and information for self-care.

conclusionAdopting a human-centered approach in designing an effective chatbot with as many human features as possible is crucial in increasing utilization, addressing the gaps presented by marginalized/vulnerable populations, and reducing the current GBV epidemic by moving prevention and response services closer to people in need.

Indexed as

Gender-Based ViolenceAdolescentArtificial IntelligenceFemaleHumansMaleSexual BehaviorTechnologyViolenceadolescent healthchatbotviolence

Identifiers

PMID37947574
PMCPMC10647327
OpenAlexW4388288713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.