ArticleMedical physics2023
Denoising magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) data using stacked autoencoder for improving signal-to-noise ratio and speed of MRS.
Article in Medical physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- MR-based techniques for imaging prostate cancer metabolism: current status and future perspectives.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Spectral Representation of Neurochemicals With Phase, Frequency Offset, and Lineshape Invariance: Application to JPRESS for In Vivo Concentration and TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Multinuclear NMR and MRI Beyond Proton Imaging: Principles, Contrast Mechanisms, and Applications in Materials and Biomedicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Identification of Cholesterol in Plaques of Atherosclerotic Using Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy and 1D U-Net Architecture.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- AI-enabled multimodal neuroimaging for neurotransmitter mapping in normal aging and age-related disease.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Review
- Multi-modal deep learning model for bipolar depression adolescents with verbal auditory hallucinations.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Exploring the Frontiers of Food Science: A Comprehensive Review of Advanced Magnetic Resonance Applications in Food Analysis, Quality Analysis, and Safety Assessment.Food science & nutrition · 2025Review
- WAND: Wavelet Analysis-Based Neural Decomposition of MRS Signals for Artifact Removal.NMR in biomedicine · 2025Article
- Deep-ER: Deep Learning ECCENTRIC Reconstruction for fast high-resolution neurometabolic imaging.NeuroImage · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhile magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides high resolution anatomical images with sharp soft tissue contrast, magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) enables non-invasive detection and measurement of biochemicals and metabolites. However, MRS has low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) when concentrations of metabolites are in the range of millimolar. Standard approach of using a high number of signal averaging (NSA) to achieve sufficient SNR comes at the cost of a long acquisition time. PURPOSE: We propose to use deep-learning approaches to denoise MRS data without increasing NSA. This method has potential to reduce the acquisition time as well as improve SNR and quality of spectra, which could enhance the diagnostic value and broaden the clinical applications of MRS.
methodsThe study was conducted using data collected from the brain spectroscopy phantom and human subjects. We utilized a stack auto-encoder (SAE) network to train deep learning models for denoising low NSA data (NSA = 1, 2, 4, 8, and 16) randomly truncated from high SNR data collected with high NSA (NSA = 192), which were also used to obtain the ground truth. We applied both self-supervised and fully-supervised training approaches and compared their performance of denoising low NSA data based on improvement in SNR. To prevent overfitting, the SAE network was trained in a patch-based manner. We then tested the denoising methods on noise-containing data collected from the phantom and human subjects, including data from brain tumor patients. We evaluated their performance by comparing the SNR levels and mean squared errors (MSEs) calculated for the whole spectra against high SNR "ground truth", as well as the value of chemical shift of N-acetyl-aspartate (NAA) before and after denoising.
resultsWith the SAE model, the SNR of low NSA data (NSA = 1) obtained from the phantom increased by 28.5% and the MSE decreased by 42.9%. For low NSA data of the human parietal and temporal lobes, the SNR increased by 32.9% and the MSE decreased by 63.1%. In all cases, the chemical shift of NAA in the denoised spectra closely matched with the high SNR spectra without significant distortion to the spectra after denoising. Furthermore, the denoising performance of the SAE model was more effective in denoising spectra with higher noise levels.
conclusionsThe reported SAE denoising method is a model-free approach to enhance the SNR of MRS data collected with low NSA. With the denoising capability, it is possible to acquire MRS data with a few NSA, shortening the scan time while maintaining adequate spectroscopic information for detecting and quantifying the metabolites of interest. This approach has the potential to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of clinical MRS data acquisition by reducing the scan time and increasing the quality of spectroscopic data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.