Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37947339›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs2023

A health equity framework to support the next generation of cancer population simulation models.

Christina Chapman, Jinani Jayasekera, Chiranjeev Dash, Vanessa Sheppard, Jeanne Mandelblatt

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Population simulation modeling of disparities in US breast cancer mortality.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Data gaps and opportunities for modeling cancer health equity.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Christina ChapmanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, and the Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety in the Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine and the Houston VA, Houston, TX, USA.
Jinani JayasekeraHealth Equity and Decision Sciences Research Laboratory, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, Intramural Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Chiranjeev DashOffice of Minority Health and Health Disparities Research and Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Vanessa SheppardDepartment of Health Behavior and Policy and Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Jeanne MandelblattDepartments of Oncology and Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Cancer Prevention and Control Program at Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center and the Georgetown Lombardi Institute for Cancer and Aging Research, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2490-005X
Baylor College of Medicine · USGeorgetown University · USNational Institutes of Health · USOffice of Minority Health · USVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

Tissue Culture Shared ResourceP30CA051008 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI MARCUS S NOEL · 1990 to 2026
$71.5M
Comparative Modeling of Precision Breast Cancer Control Across the Translational Continuum - SupplementU01CA253911 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ALAGOZ, OGUZHAN, DE KONING, HARRY J · 2020 to 2025
$10.6M
Bio-behavioral Research At The Intersection of Cancer and AgingR35CA197289 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI MANDELBLATT, JEANNE · 2015 to 2021
$6.2M
Social Determinants of Health as Transducers of Cellular Aging: A New Multi-level Paradigm to Reduce Survivorship Disparities at the Intersection of Cancer and AgingR35CA283926 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI Jeanne Mandelblatt · 2023 to 2026
$3.7M
I-REACH (Infrastructure for REsearch on Cancer and Aging)R33AG075008 · NIA · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI Lucile L. Adams-Campbell, Judith E Carroll · 2024 to 2026
$2.3M
I-REACH: Infrastructure for Research in Equity, Aging, Cancer and HealthR21AG075008 · NIA · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI ADAMS-CAMPBELL, LUCILE LAUREN, CARROLL, JUDITH E · 2022 to 2023
$475k
A Simulation Model-based Framework to Support Oncology Guidelines and PracticeK99CA241397 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI JAYASEKERA, JINANI · 2020 to 2021
$351k
NCI NIH HHS K99 CA241397NCI NIH HHS P30 CA051008NCI NIH HHS R35 CA197289NCI NIH HHS R35 CA283926NCI NIH HHS U01 CA253911NIA NIH HHS R21 AG075008NIA NIH HHS R33 AG075008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past 2 decades, population simulation modeling has evolved as an effective public health tool for surveillance of cancer trends and estimation of the impact of screening and treatment strategies on incidence and mortality, including documentation of persistent cancer inequities. The goal of this research was to provide a framework to support the next generation of cancer population simulation models to identify leverage points in the cancer control continuum to accelerate achievement of equity in cancer care for minoritized populations. In our framework, systemic racism is conceptualized as the root cause of inequity and an upstream influence acting on subsequent downstream events, which ultimately exert physiological effects on cancer incidence and mortality and competing comorbidities. To date, most simulation models investigating racial inequity have used individual-level race variables. Individual-level race is a proxy for exposure to systemic racism, not a biological construct. However, single-level race variables are suboptimal proxies for the multilevel systems, policies, and practices that perpetuate inequity. We recommend that future models designed to capture relationships between systemic racism and cancer outcomes replace or extend single-level race variables with multilevel measures that capture structural, interpersonal, and internalized racism. Models should investigate actionable levers, such as changes in health care, education, and economic structures and policies to increase equity and reductions in health-care-based interpersonal racism. This integrated approach could support novel research approaches, make explicit the effects of different structures and policies, highlight data gaps in interactions between model components mirroring how factors act in the real world, inform how we collect data to model cancer equity, and generate results that could inform policy.

Indexed as

Health EquityNeoplasmsRacismDelivery of Health CareHumansPolicySystemic Racism

Identifiers

PMID37947339
PMCPMC10846912
OpenAlexW4388556906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.