Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37947279›Full record

ArticleGenetic epidemiology2023

Limitation of permutation-based differential correlation analysis.

Hoseung Song, Michael C Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetic epidemiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hoseung SongPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2689-3735
Michael C WuPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Funding

Statistical Methods for Large Scale Microbiome Studies of Cardiovascular Disease RiskR01HL155417 · NHLBI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI WU, MICHAEL CHIAO-AN · 2021 to 2024
$1.8M
Joint Analysis of Microbiome and Other Genomic Data TypesR01GM129512 · NIGMS · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI WU, MICHAEL CHIAO-AN · 2018 to 2021
$1.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL155417NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM129512NIH HHS R01 GM129512NIH HHS R01 HL155417
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The comparison of biological systems, through the analysis of molecular changes under different conditions, has played a crucial role in the progress of modern biological science. Specifically, differential correlation analysis (DCA) has been employed to determine whether relationships between genomic features differ across conditions or outcomes. Because ascertaining the null distribution of test statistics to capture variations in correlation is challenging, several DCA methods utilize permutation which can loosen parametric (e.g., normality) assumptions. However, permutation is often problematic for DCA due to violating the assumption that samples are exchangeable under the null. Here, we examine the limitations of permutation-based DCA and investigate instances where the permutation-based DCA exhibits poor performance. Experimental results show that the permutation-based DCA often fails to control the type I error under the null hypothesis of equal correlation structures.

Indexed as

GenomicsHumansStatistics as Topicdifferential coexpressiondifferential correlationexchangeabilitypermutation test

Identifiers

PMID37947279
PMCPMC10833089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.