Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37947159›Full record

Observational studyMaternal & child nutrition2024

Dietary supplements, guideline alignment and biochemical nutrient status in pregnancy: Findings from the Queensland Family Cohort pilot study.

Linda A Gallo, Sarah E Steane, Sophia L Young, Susan de Jersey, Danielle A J M Schoenaker, Danielle J Borg, Jack Lockett, Clare E Collins, Anthony V Perkins, Sailesh Kumar and 2 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Maternal & child nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Linda A GalloSchool of Health, University of the Sunshine Coast, Petrie, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0471-8517
Sarah E SteaneSchool of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8594-3486
Sophia L YoungSchool of Health, University of the Sunshine Coast, Petrie, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5287-9115
Susan de JerseyDepartment of Dietetics and Foodservices, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6321-8558
Danielle A J M SchoenakerSchool of Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7652-990X
Danielle J BorgMater Research Institute, The University of Queensland, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6126-7583
Jack LockettMater Research Institute, The University of Queensland, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6175-985X
Clare E CollinsSchool of Health Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Anthony V PerkinsSchool of Health, University of the Sunshine Coast, Petrie, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9829-6772
Sailesh KumarMater Research Institute, The University of Queensland, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0832-4811
Vicki L CliftonMater Research Institute, The University of Queensland, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4892-6748
Shelley A WilkinsonSchool of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3365-3473

Funding

Griffith UniversityMater FoundationQueensland University of TechnologyUniversity of QueenslandUniversity of the Sunshine Coast
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In high-income nations, multiple micronutrient (MMN) supplementation during pregnancy is a common practice. We aimed to describe maternal characteristics associated with supplement use and daily dose of supplemental nutrients consumed in pregnancy, and whether guideline alignment and nutrient status are related to supplement use. The Queensland Family Cohort is a prospective, Australian observational longitudinal study. Maternal characteristics, nutrient intake from food and supplements, and biochemical nutrient status were assessed in the second trimester (n = 127). Supplement use was reported by 89% of participants, of whom 91% reported taking an MMN supplement. Participants who received private obstetric care, had private health insurance and had greater alignment to meat/vegetarian alternatives recommendations were more likely to report MMN supplement use. Private obstetric care and general practitioner shared care were associated with higher daily dose of supplemental nutrients consumed compared with midwifery group practice. There was high reliance on supplements to meet nutrient reference values for folate, iodine and iron, but only plasma folate concentrations were higher in MMN supplement versus nonsupplement users. Exceeding the upper level of intake for folic acid and iron was more likely among combined MMN and individual supplement/s users, and associated with higher plasma concentrations of the respective nutrients. Given the low alignment with food group recommendations and potential risks associated with high MMN supplement use, whole food diets should be emphasized. This study confirms the need to define effective strategies for optimizing nutrient intake in pregnancy, especially among those most vulnerable where MMN supplement use may be appropriate.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsFolic AcidAustraliaFemaleHumansIronLongitudinal StudiesMicronutrientsNutrientsPilot ProjectsPregnancyProspective StudiesQueenslandFolic AcidIronMicronutrientsNutrientsbirth cohortdietary guidelinesdietary intakesupplementationsupplement guidelines

Identifiers

PMID37947159
PMCPMC10750014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.