Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37946853›Full record

ArticleOpen mind : discoveries in cognitive science2023

Calculated Feelings: How Children Use Probability to Infer Emotions.

Tiffany Doan, Ori Friedman, Stephanie Denison

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Human Mentalizing as Rational Probabilistic Inference.Computational brain & behavior · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tiffany DoanDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5098-6005
Ori FriedmanDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2346-9787
Stephanie DenisonDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6658-4139

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developing the ability to accurately infer others' emotions is crucial for children's cognitive development. Here, we offer a new theoretical perspective on how children develop this ability. We first review recent work showing that with age, children increasingly use probability to infer emotions. We discuss how these findings do not fit with prominent accounts of how children understand emotions, namely the script account and the theory of mind account. We then outline a theory of how probability allows children to infer others' emotions. Specifically, we suggest that probability provides children with information about how much weight to put on alternative outcomes, allowing them to infer emotions by comparing outcomes to counterfactual alternatives.

Indexed as

counterfactualsemotion attributionprobability

Identifiers

PMID37946853
PMCPMC10631798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.