Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37946740›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurolinguistics2023

Using lexical semantic cues to mitigate interference effects during real-time sentence processing in aphasia.

Niloofar Akhavan, Henrike K Blumenfeld, Lewis Shapiro, Tracy Love

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurolinguistics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Niloofar AkhavanSchool of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA.
Henrike K BlumenfeldSchool of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA.
Lewis ShapiroSchool of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA.
Tracy LoveSchool of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA.

Funding

NEUROBIOLOGY OF LANGUAGE PERCEPTION--FMRI INVESTIGATIONSR01DC003681 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI HICKOK, GREGORY · 1999 to 2015
$6.9M
Neurocognitive Approaches to Communication DisordersT32DC007361 · NIDCD · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Tracy Love-Geffen · 2005 to 2026
$3.9M
SENTENCE PROCESSING IN NORMAL AND APHASIC POPULATIONSR01DC000494 · NIDCD · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SHAPIRO, LEWIS P. · 1995 to 2011
$3.0M
The temporal characteristics of brain-language relationships: Evidence from impaiR01DC009272 · NIDCD · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LOVE-GEFFEN, TRACY, SHAPIRO, LEWIS P. · 2009 to 2013
$1.6M
Perfusion informed lesion mapping in aphasiaR21DC015263 · NIDCD · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LOVE-GEFFEN, TRACY · 2015 to 2016
$413k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC000494NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC003681NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009272NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC015263NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC007361
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined the auditory sentence processing of neurologically unimpaired listeners and individuals with aphasia on canonical sentence structures in real-time using a visual-world eye-tracking paradigm. The canonical sentence constructions contained multiple noun phrases and an unaccusative verb, the latter of which formed a long-distance dependency link between the unaccusative verb and its single argument (which was base generated in the object position and then displaced to the subject position). To explore the likelihood of similarity-based interference during the real time linking of the verb and the sentence's subject noun, we manipulated the animacy feature of the noun phrases (matched or mismatched). The study's objectives were to examine whether (a) reducing the similarity-based interference by mismatching animacy features would modulate the encoding and retrieval dynamics of noun phrases in real-time; and (b) whether individuals with aphasia would demonstrate on time sensitivity to this lexical-semantic cue. Results revealed a significant effect of this manipulation in individuals both with and without aphasia. In other words, the mismatch in the representational features of the noun phrases increased the distinctiveness of the unaccusative verb's subject target at the time of syntactic retrieval (verb offset) for individuals in both groups. Moreover, individuals with aphasia were shown to be sensitive to the lexical-semantic cue, even though they appeared to process it slower than unimpaired listeners. This study extends to the cue-based retrieval model by providing new insight on the real-time mechanisms underpinning sentence comprehension.

Indexed as

Animacy mismatchAphasiaEye-trackingLexical activationSentence processing

Identifiers

PMID37946740
PMCPMC10634522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.