ReviewCurrent medicinal chemistry2025
Drug Repurposing: Insights into Current Advances and Future Applications.
Review in Current medicinal chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rupatadine Ameliorates Cisplatin-Induced Hepatotoxicity in Rats: Targeting HMGB1/TLR4/NF-κB and NLRP3/Caspase-1 Signaling Pathways.Journal of biochemical and molecular toxicology · 2026Article
- Recent advances in drug repositioning and rediscovery for different therapeutic activities utilizing updated technological approaches.Molecular diversity · 2026Review
- Impact of drug repurposing between 1985 and 2024 on pharmaceutical innovation.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Targeting Telomere Shelterin Protein TPP1 with Elbasvir: Induction of Autophagy and Suppression of Esophageal Cancer Tumorigenesis.Anti-cancer agents in medicinal chemistry · 2026Article
- Molecular docking analysis with ICBioinformation · 2025Article
- One Molecule, Many Faces: Repositioning Cardiovascular Agents for Advanced Wound Healing.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drug development is a complex and expensive process that involves extensive research and testing before a new drug can be approved for use. This has led to a limited availability of potential therapeutics for many diseases. Despite significant advances in biomedical science, the process of drug development remains a bottleneck, as all hypotheses must be tested through experiments and observations, which can be timeconsuming and costly. To address this challenge, drug repurposing has emerged as an innovative strategy for finding new uses for existing medications that go beyond their original intended use. This approach has the potential to speed up the drug development process and reduce costs, making it an attractive option for pharmaceutical companies and researchers alike. It involves the identification of existing drugs or compounds that have the potential to be used for the treatment of a different disease or condition. This can be done through a variety of approaches, including screening existing drugs against new disease targets, investigating the biological mechanisms of existing drugs, and analyzing data from clinical trials and electronic health records. Additionally, repurposing drugs can lead to the identification of new therapeutic targets and mechanisms of action, which can enhance our understanding of disease biology and lead to the development of more effective treatments. Overall, drug repurposing is an exciting and promising area of research that has the potential to revolutionize the drug development process and improve the lives of millions of people around the world. The present review provides insights on types of interaction, approaches, availability of databases, applications and limitations of drug repurposing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37946344What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.