Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37946223›Full record

ArticleFluids and barriers of the CNS2023

The influence of upright posture on craniospinal, arteriovenous, and abdominal pressures in a chronic ovine in-vivo trial.

Anthony Podgoršak, Nina Eva Trimmel, Markus Florian Oertel, Margarete Arras, Miriam Weisskopf, Marianne Schmid Daners

Abstract readClinical Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in Fluids and barriers of the CNS, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anthony PodgoršakDepartment of Mechanical and Process Engineering, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Nina Eva TrimmelCenter for Preclinical Development, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Markus Florian OertelDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Margarete ArrasCenter for Preclinical Development, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Miriam WeisskopfCenter for Preclinical Development, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Marianne Schmid DanersDepartment of Mechanical and Process Engineering, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. marischm@ethz.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMost investigations into postural influences on craniospinal and adjacent physiology have been performed in anesthetized animals. A comprehensive study evaluating these physiologies while awake has yet been completed.

methodsSix awake sheep had telemetric pressure sensors (100 Hz) implanted to measure intracranial, intrathecal, arterial, central venous, cranial, caudal, dorsal, and ventral intra-abdominal pressure (ICP, ITP, ABP, CVP, IAPcr, IAPcd, IAPds, IAPve, respectively). They were maneuvered upright by placing in a chair for two minutes; repeated 25 times over one month. Changes in mean and pulse pressure were calculated by comparing pre-chair, P0, with three phases during the maneuver: P1, chair entrance; P2, chair halftime; P3, prior to chair exit. Statistical significance (p ≤ .05) was assessed using repeated measures ANOVA.

resultsSignificant mean pressure changes of (P1 - P0) and (P3 - P0) were measured at - 12.1 ± 3.1 and - 14.2 ± 3.0(p < .001), 40.8 ± 10.5 and 37.7 ± 3.5(p = .019), 9.7 ± 8.3 and 6.2 ± 5.3(p = .012), 22.3 ± 29.8 and 12.5 ± 12.1(p = .042), and 11.7 ± 3.9 and 9.0 ± 5.2(p = .014) mmHg, for ICP, ITP, IAPds, IAPcr, IAPca, respectively. For pulse pressures, significant changes of (P1 - P0) and (P3 - P0) were measured at - 1.3 ± 0.7 and - 2.0 ± 1.1(p < .001), 4.7 ± 2.3 and 1.4 ± 1.4(p < .001), 15.0 ± 10.2 and 7.3 ± 5.5(p < .001), - 0.7 ± 1.8 and - 1.7 ± 1.7(p < .001), - 1.3 ± 4.2 and - 1.4 ± 4.7(p = .006), and 0.3 ± 3.9 and - 1.0 ± 1.3(p < .001) mmHg, for ICP, ITP, ABP, IAPds, IAPcr, IAPca, respectively.

conclusionsPressures changed posture-dependently to differing extents. Changes were most pronounced immediately after entering upright posture (P1) and became less prominent over the chair duration (P2-to-P3), suggesting increased physiologic compensation. Dynamic changes in IAP varied across abdominal locations, motivating the abdominal cavity not to be considered as a unified entity, but sub-compartments with individual dynamics.

Indexed as

PostureAnimalsBlood PressureSheepArterial blood pressureCerebrospinal fluidHydrocephalusIntracranial pressureOvine modelPhysiology

Identifiers

PMID37946223
PMCPMC10634040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.