Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37946142›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2023

Developing the intersectionality supplemented Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and tools for intersectionality considerations.

Isabel B Rodrigues, Christine Fahim, Yasmin Garad, Justin Presseau, Alison M Hoens, Jessica Braimoh, Diane Duncan, Lora Bruyn-Martin, Sharon E Straus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A Culturally Adapted Perioperative Mental Health Intervention for Older Black Surgical Patients.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Navigating grey areas in HIV and mental health implementation science.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Isabel B RodriguesDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Christine FahimKnowledge Translation Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. Christine.Fahim@unityhealth.to.
Yasmin GaradKnowledge Translation Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Justin PresseauClinical Epidemiology, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Alison M HoensDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Jessica BraimohDepartment of Social Science, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Diane DuncanPhysician Learning Program, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Lora Bruyn-MartinResearch Institute for Aging, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Sharon E StrausKnowledge Translation Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

CIHR 201702IGK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe concept of intersectionality proposes that demographic and social constructs intersect with larger social structures of oppression and privilege to shape experiences. While intersectionality is a widely accepted concept in feminist and gender studies, there has been little attempt to use this lens in implementation science. We aimed to supplement the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), a commonly used framework in implementation science, to support the incorporation of intersectionality in implementation science projects by (1) integrating an intersectional lens to the CFIR; and (2) developing a tool for researchers to be used alongside the updated framework.

methodsUsing a nominal group technique, an interdisciplinary framework committee (n = 17) prioritized the CFIR as one of three implementation science models, theories, and frameworks to supplement with intersectionality considerations; the modification of the other two frameworks are described in other papers. The CFIR subgroup (n = 7) reviewed the five domains and 26 constructs in the CFIR and prioritized domains and constructs for supplementation with intersectional considerations. The subgroup then iteratively developed recommendations and prompts for incorporating an intersectional approach within the prioritized domains and constructs. We developed recommendations and prompts to help researchers consider how personal identities and power structures may affect the facilitators and inhibitors of behavior change and the implementation of subsequent interventions.

resultsWe achieved consensus on how to apply an intersectional lens to CFIR after six rounds of meetings. The final intersectionality supplemented CFIR includes the five original domains, and 28 constructs; the outer systems and structures and the outer cultures constructs were added to the outer setting domain. Intersectionality prompts were added to 13 of the 28 constructs.

conclusionThrough an expert-consensus approach, we modified the CFIR to include intersectionality considerations and developed a tool with prompts to help implementation users apply an intersectional lens using the updated framework.

Indexed as

Implementation ScienceIntersectional FrameworkHumansCFIRConsolidated framework for implementation researchDiversityEquityFrameworksImplementation scienceInclusionIntersectionalityKnowledge translationModelsTheories

Identifiers

PMID37946142
PMCPMC10636989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.