Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37946132›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2023

Adapting and implementing breast cancer follow-up in primary care: protocol for a mixed methods hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation cluster randomized study.

Sarah J Fadem, Benjamin F Crabtree, Denalee M O'Malley, Lisa Mikesell, Jeanne M Ferrante, Deborah L Toppmeyer, Pamela A Ohman-Strickland, Jennifer R Hemler, Jenna Howard, Alicja Bator and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05400941 (Adapting and Implementing Evidence-based Breast Cancer Follow-up in Primary Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05400941 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Adapting and Implementing Evidence-based Breast Cancer Follow-up in Primary Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorRutgers, The State University of New JerseyRan2024 to 2026Enrolled910ConditionsCancer, Breast, Health Care UtilizationArmsPractice Led Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Identifying Patients with Breast Cancer History Using Epic Electronic Health Record.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah J FademDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, Research Division, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Benjamin F CrabtreeDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, Research Division, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Denalee M O'MalleyDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, Research Division, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Lisa MikesellInstitute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Jeanne M FerranteDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, Research Division, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Deborah L ToppmeyerRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Pamela A Ohman-StricklandSchool of Public Health, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Jennifer R HemlerDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, Research Division, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Jenna HowardDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, Research Division, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Alicja BatorDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, Research Division, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Ayana April-SandersSchool of Public Health, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Rachel KurtzmanDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, Research Division, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Shawna V HudsonDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, Research Division, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA. hudsonsh@rwjms.rutgers.edu.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USJohnson University · USRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey

Funding

Translational Research Support CoreP30ES005022 · NIEHS · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI ROBERT John LAUMBACH · 1988 to 2026
$47.4M
Diversity Supplement to Adapting and implementing evidence-based breast cancer follow-up in primary careR01CA257197 · NCI · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HUDSON, SHAWNA V. · 2021 to 2025
$3.7M
HRSA HHS 5 T32HP42017-02-00NCI NIH HHS R01 CA257197NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES005022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvances in detection and treatment for breast cancer have led to an increase in the number of individuals managing significant late and long-term treatment effects. Primary care has a role in caring for patients with a history of cancer, yet there is little guidance on how to effectively implement survivorship care evidence into primary care delivery.

methodsThis protocol describes a multi-phase, mixed methods, stakeholder-driven research process that prioritizes actionable, evidence-based primary care improvements to enhance breast cancer survivorship care by integrating implementation and primary care transformation frameworks: the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) framework and the Practice Change Model (PCM). Informed by depth interviews and a four round Delphi panel with diverse stakeholders from primary care and oncology, we will implement and evaluate an iterative clinical intervention in a hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation cluster randomized design in twenty-six primary care practices. Multi-component implementation strategies will include facilitation, audit and feedback, and learning collaboratives. Ongoing data collection and analysis will be performed to optimize adoption of the intervention. The primary clinical outcome to test effectiveness is comprehensive breast cancer follow-up care. Implementation will be assessed using mixed methods to explore how organizational and contextual variables affect adoption, implementation, and early sustainability for provision of follow-up care, symptom, and risk management activities at six- and 12-months post implementation. DISCUSSION: Study findings are poised to inform development of scalable, high impact intervention processes to enhance long-term follow-up care for patients with a history of breast cancer in primary care. If successful, next steps would include working with a national primary care practice-based research network to implement a national dissemination study. Actionable activities and processes identified could also be applied to development of organizational and care delivery interventions for follow-up care for other cancer sites.

trial registrationRegistered with ClinicalTrials.gov on June 2, 2022: NCT05400941.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDelivery of Health CareFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansPrimary Health CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignBreast cancerCancer survivorshipEPISImplementation strategiesPractice change modelPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID37946132
PMCPMC10634067
OpenAlexW4388529900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.