Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37946104›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2023

Exploring the potential of incremental feature selection to improve genomic prediction accuracy.

Felix Heinrich, Thomas Martin Lange, Magdalena Kircher, Faisal Ramzan, Armin Otto Schmitt, Mehmet Gültas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Multi-variant GWAS and genomic prediction dissect the genetic architecture underlying tomato fruit weight.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Insights from farmingbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Felix HeinrichBreeding Informatics Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Georg-August University, Margarethe von Wrangell-Weg 7, 37075, Göttingen, Germany. felix.heinrich@uni-goettingen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6093-8522
Thomas Martin LangeBreeding Informatics Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Georg-August University, Margarethe von Wrangell-Weg 7, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.
Magdalena KircherInstitute for Animal Breeding and Genetics, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Bünteweg 17p, 30559, Hannover, Germany.
Faisal RamzanInstitute of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Jail Road, 38000, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Armin Otto Schmitt *Breeding Informatics Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Georg-August University, Margarethe von Wrangell-Weg 7, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.
Mehmet Gültas *Center for Integrated Breeding Research (CiBreed), Georg-August University, Albrecht-Thaer-Weg 3, 37075, Göttingen, Germany. gueltas.mehmet@fh-swf.de.
University of Göttingen · DESouth Westphalia University of Applied Sciences · DEUniversity of Faisalabad · PKUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ever-increasing availability of high-density genomic markers in the form of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) enables genomic prediction, i.e. the inference of phenotypes based solely on genomic data, in the field of animal and plant breeding, where it has become an important tool. However, given the limited number of individuals, the abundance of variables (SNPs) can reduce the accuracy of prediction models due to overfitting or irrelevant SNPs. Feature selection can help to reduce the number of irrelevant SNPs and increase the model performance. In this study, we investigated an incremental feature selection approach based on ranking the SNPs according to the results of a genome-wide association study that we combined with random forest as a prediction model, and we applied it on several animal and plant datasets.

resultsApplying our approach to different datasets yielded a wide range of outcomes, i.e. from a substantial increase in prediction accuracy in a few cases to minor improvements when only a fraction of the available SNPs were used. Compared with models using all available SNPs, our approach was able to achieve comparable performances with a considerably reduced number of SNPs in several cases. Our approach showcased state-of-the-art efficiency and performance while having a faster computation time.

conclusionsThe results of our study suggest that our incremental feature selection approach has the potential to improve prediction accuracy substantially. However, this gain seems to depend on the genomic data used. Even for datasets where the number of markers is smaller than the number of individuals, feature selection may still increase the performance of the genomic prediction. Our approach is implemented in R and is available at https://github.com/FelixHeinrich/GP_with_IFS/ .

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyModels, GeneticAnimalsGenomeGenomicsHumansPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID37946104
PMCPMC10634161
OpenAlexW4388516855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.