Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37946052›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2024

Joint line position change in primary total knee arthroplasty: a radiographic analysis comparing conventional and robotic techniques.

Nicholas F Cozzarelli, Cristian A DeSimone, Taylor D'Amore, Matthew B Sherman, Jess H Lonner

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nicholas F CozzarelliDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, 125 South 9th Street Suite 1000, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA. nick.cozzarelli@rothmanortho.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3044-3131
Cristian A DeSimoneDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, 125 South 9th Street Suite 1000, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Taylor D'AmoreDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, 125 South 9th Street Suite 1000, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Matthew B ShermanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, 125 South 9th Street Suite 1000, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Jess H LonnerDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, 125 South 9th Street Suite 1000, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Thomas Jefferson University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeJoint line (JL) position change in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may alter knee biomechanics and impact function. The purpose of this study was to compare the change in JL position between robotic-assisted TKA (RA-TKA) and conventional TKA (C-TKA).

methodsA retrospective, radiographic analysis was conducted of patients who underwent RA-TKA and C-TKA to compare JL position change. JL position was measured in consecutive RA-TKAs and C-TKAs performed by four fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeons. Statistical analysis was done utilizing t-tests and Mann Whitney U tests, with statistical significance being defined as a p value < 0.05.

resultsSix hundred total RA-TKAs and 400 total C-TKAs were included in the analysis. There were no significant differences in patient baseline characteristics such as body mass index, range of motion, and tibiofemoral coronal alignment. RA-TKAs were associated with an average of 0.04 (2.2) mm JL position change, and C-TKAs were associated with an average 0.5 (3.2) mm JL position change (p = 0.030). There were inter-surgeon differences when comparing the change in JL position for RA-TKAs and C-TKAs between the four participating surgeons.

conclusionRA-TKA leads to better preservation of the JL position than C-TKA, and this seems to be dependent on the arthroplasty surgeon's preferences and techniques during TKA. Whether this statistically significant difference is clinically relevant needs to be further investigated.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeKnee ProsthesisOsteoarthritis, KneeRobotic Surgical ProceduresHumansKneeKnee JointRetrospective StudiesConventionalDistalizationElevationJoint lineRobotic assistedTKATotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID37946052
PMCPMC10933191
OpenAlexW4388522853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.