Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37946024›Full record

ReviewChirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2023

[Surgery for primary splenic tumors and metastases of the spleen].

F Huettl, H Lang

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

F HuettlKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland.
H LangKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland. hauke.lang@unimedizin-mainz.de.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The correct indications for surgical treatment of primary splenic tumors as well as metastases of the spleen are challenging due to the rarity of the various entities. Primary solid splenic tumors include benign lesions, such as hemangiomas, hamartomas and sclerosing angiomatous nodular transformation (SANT) of the spleen. In these cases, surgical treatment is indicated only in the case of inconclusive imaging and after careful consideration of the risk-benefit ratio, even in the case of pronounced symptoms. In contrast, primary angiosarcoma or undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma as highly malignant tumors represent an urgent indication for surgery. Although more frequent than primary splenic malignancies, secondary splenic tumors are also not that frequent. Solitary splenic metastases are rare; however, from an oncological point of view they can be treated by resection. In the case of oligometastasis with splenic involvement, splenectomy is used only as part of a palliative concept in cases of pronounced symptoms or in the context of cytoreductive surgery. In general, the laparoscopic approach is to be preferred when the operation is technically feasible as it is associated with fewer pulmonary and infectious complications and a shorter hospital stay. In addition, to reduce the risk of severe infections after splenectomy, the option of partial splenectomy should be considered, especially for benign lesions. A thorough informing of the patient regarding both intraoperative and perioperative risks as well as potential long-term sequelae, especially severe infectious diseases, is an essential component of informed consent before surgery.

Indexed as

Splenic DiseasesSplenic NeoplasmsDiagnostic ImagingHumansSplenectomyBenign splenic tumorsIndications for surgeryMalignant splenic tumorsPartial splenectomySplenectomy

Identifiers

PMID37946024
OpenAlexW4388518711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.