ReviewChirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2023
[Surgery for primary splenic tumors and metastases of the spleen].
Review in Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Laparoscopic Subtotal Splenectomy: A Feasible Option in the Treatment of Splenic Metastasis.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT for diagnosing and staging solitary malignant tumors of the spleen.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- A Glimpse into the Role and Effectiveness of Splenectomy for Isolated Metachronous Spleen Metastasis of Colorectal Cancer Origin: Long-Term Survivals Can Be Achieved.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Spontaneous splenic rupture as the initial symptom of splenic angiosarcoma: case report and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The correct indications for surgical treatment of primary splenic tumors as well as metastases of the spleen are challenging due to the rarity of the various entities. Primary solid splenic tumors include benign lesions, such as hemangiomas, hamartomas and sclerosing angiomatous nodular transformation (SANT) of the spleen. In these cases, surgical treatment is indicated only in the case of inconclusive imaging and after careful consideration of the risk-benefit ratio, even in the case of pronounced symptoms. In contrast, primary angiosarcoma or undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma as highly malignant tumors represent an urgent indication for surgery. Although more frequent than primary splenic malignancies, secondary splenic tumors are also not that frequent. Solitary splenic metastases are rare; however, from an oncological point of view they can be treated by resection. In the case of oligometastasis with splenic involvement, splenectomy is used only as part of a palliative concept in cases of pronounced symptoms or in the context of cytoreductive surgery. In general, the laparoscopic approach is to be preferred when the operation is technically feasible as it is associated with fewer pulmonary and infectious complications and a shorter hospital stay. In addition, to reduce the risk of severe infections after splenectomy, the option of partial splenectomy should be considered, especially for benign lesions. A thorough informing of the patient regarding both intraoperative and perioperative risks as well as potential long-term sequelae, especially severe infectious diseases, is an essential component of informed consent before surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.