ArticleAAPS PharmSciTech2023
One Platform Comparison of Polymeric and Lipidic Nanoparticles for the Delivery of Amphotericin B.
Article in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lipid-Based Drug Delivery Systems as Emerging Tools to Overcome Antifungal Resistance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Development of Novel Approaches for the Treatment of Cutaneous Candidiasis.Current pharmaceutical design · 2026Review
- DMR040, a potential antifungal compound.The Journal of antibiotics · 2025Article
- Amphotericin B Encapsulation in Polymeric Nanoparticles: Toxicity Insights via Cells and Zebrafish Embryo Testing.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Amphotericin B (AmB) is a membrane-acting antibiotic used for the treatment of fungal and protozoal infections. AmB exists in various molecular forms, i.e., monomeric, super-aggregated, and oligomeric forms, where oligomeric forms are highly toxic because of their relative affinity toward cholesterol present over human cell membrane. Hence, the objective of our research work was to study the aggregation state of AmB in two different nanoformulations, i.e., solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) and zein-based nanoparticles (PNPs), with the aim of enhancing the fraction of less toxic form of AmB, and a comparative study was performed. The zein and glyceryl monostearate can intercalate the polyenic domain of AmB and thereby hinder the hydrophobic attractions between the AmB molecules, which allows their existence in monomeric forms. The particle size of AmB-SLNs and AmB-PNPs were 378.90 ± 9.50 nm and 184.90 ± 6.00 nm, while zeta potential was -34.97 ± 0.51 mV and +28.93 ± 2.29 mV, respectively. In vitro release studies showed more controlled release of AmB from PNPs (52.48 ± 1.07%) as compared to SLNs (86.33 ± 0.93%). The predominant aggregation state of AmB in both formulations was determined by UV-visible and circular dichroism spectrophotometry, where a higher degree of monomerization of AmB was reported in AmB-SLNs as compared to AmB-PNPs. Toxicity of the nanoformulations was evaluated through hemolysis test, where the results suggested that AmB-SLNs and AmB-PNPs were less hemolytic as compared to pure AmB. The nanoformulations demonstrated the predominant monomeric form of AmB, which may offer higher selectivity index toward microbial membrane.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.