Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37945914›Full record

ReviewArchives of women's mental health2025

Reproductive psychiatric advance directives: promoting autonomy for perinatal people with serious mental illness diagnoses.

Emily C Dossett, Sonja L Castañeda-Cudney, Michelle T Nguyen, Melisa Olgun, Jennifer Wang, Keris Jän Myrick, Laurie Hallmark, Elyn R Saks

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of women's mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Post partum decision making, letter to the editor.Archives of women's mental health · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Forensic aspects of reproductive mental health: editorial.Archives of women's mental health · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emily C DossettDepartments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 2250 Alcazar Street, Suite 2200, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA. edossett@dhs.lacounty.gov.ORCID 0000-0003-0721-7731
Sonja L Castañeda-CudneyPrice School of Policy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Michelle T NguyenDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4908-958X
Melisa OlgunYale School of Law, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Jennifer WangKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Keris Jän MyrickDisability Rights California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Laurie HallmarkAttorney and Subject Matter Expert Consultant Psychiatric Advance Directives, The Hallmark Compass, LLC, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Elyn R SaksGould School of Law, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

California Health Care Foundation G-38320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People with serious mental illness (SMI) diagnoses who become pregnant are particularly vulnerable to symptom recurrence and resulting potential lack of decision-making capacity (Taylor et al. J Psychiatr Res 104:100-107, 2018; Bagadia et al. Int J Soc Psychiatry 66:792-798, 2020). In these situations, prenatal and behavioral health providers have little legally viable guidance on what medical and/or psychiatric care the patient desires (Aneja and Arora Indian J Med Ethics V:133-139, 2020). We created a "Reproductive Psychiatric Advance Directive (PAD)," grounded in Reproductive Justice principles, that promotes patient autonomy by proactively articulating perinatal medical and psychiatric care preferences. We conducted a medical and legal literature review using two sets of terms related to (1) PADs and (2) reproductive health. We convened an expert working group of legal, medical, psychiatric, peer, and advocacy leaders and community-based organizations to develop a Reproductive PAD. Our literature review yielded no results about Reproductive PADs. We created de novo a Reproductive PAD template with sections on medical and psychiatric history, informed consent for critical medical and psychiatric care, family planning and custody preferences, and optional sections on abortion and on electroconvulsive therapy. The Reproductive PAD provides a possible legal mechanism for people of childbearing age with SMI diagnoses to articulate their medical and psychiatric care choices around reproduction and pregnancy. Future research should evaluate the Reproductive PAD as an effective tool for protecting patient autonomy during pregnancy and postpartum and guiding medical and psychiatric providers.

Indexed as

Advance DirectivesMental DisordersPersonal AutonomyDecision MakingFemaleHumansPregnancyAutonomyPerinatal mental healthPregnancyPsychiatric advance directiveSerious mental illness

Identifiers

PMID37945914
PMCPMC12092564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.