ArticleScientific reports2023
Localization of early infarction on non-contrast CT images in acute ischemic stroke with deep learning approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep learning-based optical coherence tomography and retinal images for detection of diabetic retinopathy: a systematic and meta analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in neurology practice: promise, perils, and a roadmap for responsible integration.Journal of neurology · 2026Review
- Current State of the Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Stroke: A Literature Review.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Current Stroke Solutions Using Artificial Intelligence: A Review of the Literature.Brain sciences · 2024Review
- Application of Artificial Intelligence in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Scoping Review.Neurointervention · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Localization of early infarction on first-line Non-contrast computed tomogram (NCCT) guides prompt treatment to improve stroke outcome. Our previous study has shown a good performance in the identification of ischemic injury on NCCT. In the present study, we developed a deep learning (DL) localization model to help localize the early infarction sign on NCCT. This retrospective study included consecutive 517 ischemic stroke (IS) patients who received NCCT within 12 h after stroke onset. A total of 21,436 infarction patches and 20,391 non-infarction patches were extracted from the slice pool of 1,634 NCCT according to brain symmetricity property. The generated patches were fed into different pretrained convolutional neural network (CNN) models such as Visual Geometry Group 16 (VGG16), GoogleNet, Residual Networks 50 (ResNet50), Inception-ResNet-v2 (IR-v2), Inception-v3 and Inception-v4. The selected VGG16 model could detect the early infarction in both supratentorial and infratentorial regions to achieve an average area under curve (AUC) 0.73 after extensive customization. The properly tuned-VGG16 model could identify the early infarction in the cortical, subcortical and cortical plus subcortical areas of supratentorial region with the mean AUC > 0.70. Further, the model could attain 95.6% of accuracy on recognizing infarction lesion in 494 out of 517 IS patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.