Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37945699›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Histological classification of canine and feline lymphoma using a modular approach based on deep learning and advanced image processing.

Andreas Haghofer, Andrea Fuchs-Baumgartinger, Karoline Lipnik, Robert Klopfleisch, Marc Aubreville, Josef Scharinger, Herbert Weissenböck, Stephan M Winkler, Christof A Bertram

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Andreas HaghoferBioinformatics Research Group, University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, Softwarepark 11-13, 4232, Hagenberg, Austria. Andreas.haghofer@fh-hagenberg.at.
Andrea Fuchs-BaumgartingerInstitute of Pathology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Veterinärplatz 1, 1210, Vienna, Austria.
Karoline LipnikInstitute of Pathology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Veterinärplatz 1, 1210, Vienna, Austria.
Robert KlopfleischInstitute of Veterinary Pathology, Freie Univerisität Berlin, Robert-von-Ostertag-Str. 15, 14163, Berlin, Germany.
Marc AubrevilleTechnische Hochschule Ingolstadt, Esplanade 10, 85049, Ingolstadt, Germany.
Josef ScharingerInstitute of Computational Perception, Johannes Kepler University, Altenberger Straße 69, 4040, Linz, Austria.
Herbert WeissenböckInstitute of Pathology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Veterinärplatz 1, 1210, Vienna, Austria.
Stephan M WinklerBioinformatics Research Group, University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, Softwarepark 11-13, 4232, Hagenberg, Austria.
Christof A BertramInstitute of Pathology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Veterinärplatz 1, 1210, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Histopathological examination of tissue samples is essential for identifying tumor malignancy and the diagnosis of different types of tumor. In the case of lymphoma classification, nuclear size of the neoplastic lymphocytes is one of the key features to differentiate the different subtypes. Based on the combination of artificial intelligence and advanced image processing, we provide a workflow for the classification of lymphoma with regards to their nuclear size (small, intermediate, and large). As the baseline for our workflow testing, we use a Unet++ model trained on histological images of canine lymphoma with individually labeled nuclei. As an alternative to the Unet++, we also used a publicly available pre-trained and unmodified instance segmentation model called Stardist to demonstrate that our modular classification workflow can be combined with different types of segmentation models if they can provide proper nuclei segmentation. Subsequent to nuclear segmentation, we optimize algorithmic parameters for accurate classification of nuclear size using a newly derived reference size and final image classification based on a pathologists-derived ground truth. Our image classification module achieves a classification accuracy of up to 92% on canine lymphoma data. Compared to the accuracy ranging from 66.67 to 84% achieved using measurements provided by three individual pathologists, our algorithm provides a higher accuracy level and reproducible results. Our workflow also demonstrates a high transferability to feline lymphoma, as shown by its accuracy of up to 84.21%, even though our workflow was not optimized for feline lymphoma images. By determining the nuclear size distribution in tumor areas, our workflow can assist pathologists in subtyping lymphoma based on the nuclei size and potentially improve reproducibility. Our proposed approach is modular and comprehensible, thus allowing adaptation for specific tasks and increasing the users' trust in computer-assisted image classification.

Indexed as

Cat DiseasesDeep LearningDog DiseasesLymphomaAnimalsArtificial IntelligenceCatsDogsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID37945699
PMCPMC10636139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.