ArticleScientific reports2023
Improving the classification of veterinary thoracic radiographs through inter-species and inter-pathology self-supervised pre-training of deep learning models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bibliometric Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Use in Small Animal Thoracic Radiography.Veterinary medicine and science · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence for the Diagnosis of Respiratory Diseases in Dogs and Cats: A Systematic Review.Veterinary sciences · 2026Review
- Raman spectral band imaging for the diagnostics and classification of canine and feline cutaneous tumors.The veterinary quarterly · 2025Article
- CXR-MultiTaskNet a unified deep learning framework for joint disease localization and classification in chest radiographs.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Applications and Considerations of Artificial Intelligence in Veterinary Sciences: A Narrative Review.Veterinary medicine and science · 2025Review
- Federated Multi-Label Learning (FMLL): Innovative Method for Classification Tasks in Animal Science.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The analysis of veterinary radiographic imaging data is an essential step in the diagnosis of many thoracic lesions. Given the limited time that physicians can devote to a single patient, it would be valuable to implement an automated system to help clinicians make faster but still accurate diagnoses. Currently, most of such systems are based on supervised deep learning approaches. However, the problem with these solutions is that they need a large database of labeled data. Access to such data is often limited, as it requires a great investment of both time and money. Therefore, in this work we present a solution that allows higher classification scores to be obtained using knowledge transfer from inter-species and inter-pathology self-supervised learning methods. Before training the network for classification, pretraining of the model was performed using self-supervised learning approaches on publicly available unlabeled radiographic data of human and dog images, which allowed substantially increasing the number of images for this phase. The self-supervised learning approaches included the Beta Variational Autoencoder, the Soft-Introspective Variational Autoencoder, and a Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representations. After the initial pretraining, fine-tuning was performed for the collected veterinary dataset using 20% of the available data. Next, a latent space exploration was performed for each model after which the encoding part of the model was fine-tuned again, this time in a supervised manner for classification. Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representations proved to be the most beneficial pretraining method. Therefore, it was for this method that experiments with various fine-tuning methods were carried out. We achieved a mean ROC AUC score of 0.77 and 0.66, respectively, for the laterolateral and dorsoventral projection datasets. The results show significant improvement compared to using the model without any pretraining approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.