Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37945629›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Evaluation of a new point-of-care diagnostic test measuring inflammation in emergency settings.

Olivier L Charansonney, Ghanima Al-Dandachi, Patrick Plaisance, Eric Vicaut

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Olivier L CharansonneyCardiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Sud-Francilien (CHSF), Corbeil-Essonnes, France. olivier.charansonney@chsf.fr.
Ghanima Al-DandachiEmergency Department, Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France.
Patrick PlaisanceEmergency Department, Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France.
Eric VicautClinical Research Unit, Hôpital Fernand-Widal, Paris, France.
Hôpital Lariboisière · FRCentre Hospitalier Sud Francilien · FRHôpital Fernand-Widal · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Erythrocyte aggregation kinetics is accelerated in diseases with a strong inflammation component. This study aimed to evaluate whether, in an emergency setting, a new point-of-care test measuring erythrocyte aggregation kinetics (EAK) can identify patients with underlying inflammation. Patients visiting an emergency department and needing a blood exam were successively included. EAK was measured at the point-of-care in 20 s directly on the blood samples collected in regular tubes without any manipulation. The primary measure was EAK's half-life during the first 5 s (EAK5s). Each patient's inflammation status was assessed blind to the EAK test results. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves for inflammation status were built. 268 patients had their EAK5s measured, and a clear inflammation status was determined for 214 patients (65 had inflammation). Mean EAK5s were 2.18 s and 1.75 s for no inflammation and inflammation groups respectively (p < 0.001). EAK5s appears to be a better inflammation marker than C-Reactive protein (CRP), with an area under the ROC curve of 0.845 compared to 0.806 for CRP (p < 0.0001). The Youden threshold for prediction of inflammation was 1.86 s with 84.6% (78.5-89.9%) specificity and 70.8% (60-81.5%) sensitivity. Point-of-care EAK is an easily measured, immediately available marker of inflammation with a better predictive power than CRP's.

Indexed as

C-Reactive ProteinInflammationBiomarkersHumansPoint-of-Care TestingPredictive Value of TestsROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkersC-Reactive Protein

Identifiers

PMID37945629
PMCPMC10636126
OpenAlexW4388520552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.