Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37945610›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

The effect of cuproptosis-relevant genes on the immune infiltration and metabolism of gynecological oncology by multiply analysis and experiments validation.

Xiao-Min Ran, Hui Xiao, Yan-Xiang Tang, Xia Jin, Xing Tang, Juan Zhang, Hui Li, Yu-Kun Li, Zhen-Zi Tang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Targeting cuproplasia and cuproptosis in cancer.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Xiao-Min RanDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology Ward5, Hunan Cancer Hospital, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Hui XiaoDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology Ward1, Hunan Cancer Hospital, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Yan-Xiang TangDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology Ward1, Hunan Cancer Hospital, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Xia JinDepartment of Pathology, Hunan Cancer Hospital, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Xing TangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of the University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China.
Juan ZhangDepartment of Assisted Reproductive Centre, Zhuzhou Central Hospital, Xiangya Hospital, Zhuzhou Central South University, Central South University, Zhuzhou, Hunan, China.
Hui LiDepartment of Assisted Reproductive Centre, Zhuzhou Central Hospital, Xiangya Hospital, Zhuzhou Central South University, Central South University, Zhuzhou, Hunan, China.
Yu-Kun LiDepartment of Assisted Reproductive Centre, Zhuzhou Central Hospital, Xiangya Hospital, Zhuzhou Central South University, Central South University, Zhuzhou, Hunan, China.
Zhen-Zi TangDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology Ward1, Hunan Cancer Hospital, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China. Tangzhenzi_hnca@163.com.
Central South University · CNHunan Cancer Hospital · CNUniversity of South China · CNZhuzhou Central Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gynecological cancers are a leading cause of mortality for women, including ovarian cancer (OC), cervical squamous cell carcinoma (CESC), and uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma (UCEC). Nevertheless, these gynecological cancer types have not elucidated the role of cuproptosis and the correlated tumor microenvironment (TME) infiltration features. CRGs had important potential molecular functions and prognostic significance in gynecological cancers, especially in UCEC. Hub CRG, FDX1, was correlated with the CD8+ T cell immune infiltration in UCEC and CESC. FDX1 OE could significantly repress the proliferation ability in UCEC cells by MTT, EdU, and clone formation. High levels of FDX1 could repress ATP and lactic acid but enhance ROS and glucose levels by metabolism assay. The xenograft tumor model indicated that FDX1 OE significantly inhibited the growth of UCEC and attenuated the PCNA, HK2, PKM2, and Ki-67 expression. These CRGs are significant roles that could be potential markers and treatment targets to optimize the TME immune cell infiltration features for gynecological cancer types. FDX1 is a hub CRGs in UCEC to promote immune infiltration and attenuate proliferation and metabolism.

Indexed as

ApoptosisCarcinoma, EndometrioidCarcinoma, Squamous CellOvarian NeoplasmsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAnimalsBiological AssayCopperDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHumansTumor MicroenvironmentCopper

Identifiers

PMID37945610
PMCPMC10636103
OpenAlexW4388530209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.