Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37945307›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Infographic summaries for clinical practice guidelines: results from user testing of the BMJ Rapid Recommendations in primary care.

Pieter Van Bostraeten, Bert Aertgeerts, Geertruida E Bekkering, Nicolas Delvaux, Charlotte Dijckmans, Elise Ostyn, Willem Soontjens, Wout Matthysen, Anna Haers, Matisse Vanheeswyck and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Pieter Van BostraetenDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium pieter.vanbostraeten@kuleuven.be.ORCID 0000-0002-9145-853X
Bert AertgeertsDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium.
Geertruida E BekkeringDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-3845-1507
Nicolas DelvauxDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7335-4075
Charlotte DijckmansDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium.
Elise OstynDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium.
Willem SoontjensDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium.
Wout MatthysenDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium.
Anna HaersDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium.
Matisse VanheeswyckDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium.
Alexander VandekendelaereDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium.
Niels Van der AuweraDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium.
Noémie SchenkDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium.
Will Stahl-TimminsData Graphics Designer, The BMJ, London, UK.
Thomas AgoritsasDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6182-9969
Mieke VermandereDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-0437-6633

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesInfographics have the potential to enhance knowledge translation and implementation of clinical practice guidelines at the point of care. They can provide a synoptic view of recommendations, their rationale and supporting evidence. They should be understandable and easy to use. Little evaluation of these infographics regarding user experience has taken place. We explored general practitioners' experiences with five selected BMJ Rapid Recommendation infographics suited for primary care.

methodsAn iterative, qualitative user testing design was applied on two consecutive groups of 10 general practitioners for five selected infographics. The physicians used the infographics before clinical encounters and we performed hybrid think-aloud interviews afterwards. 20 interviews were analysed using the Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven.

resultsMany clinicians reported that the infographics were simple and rewarding to use, time-efficient and easy to understand. They were perceived as innovative and their knowledge basis as trustworthy and supportive for decision-making. The interactive, expandable format was preferred over a static version as general practitioners focused mainly on the core message. Rapid access through the electronic health record was highly desirable. The main issues were about the use of complex scales and terminology. Understanding terminology related to evidence appraisal as well as the interpretation of statistics and unfamiliar scales remained difficult, despite the infographics.

conclusionsGeneral practitioners perceive infographics as useful tools for guideline translation and implementation in primary care. They offer information in an enjoyable and user friendly format and are used mainly for rapid, tailored and just in time information retrieval. We recommend future infographic producers to provide information as concise as possible, carefully define the core message and explore ways to enhance the understandability of statistics and difficult concepts related to evidence appraisal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: MP011977.

Indexed as

Data VisualizationGeneral PractitionersHumansPrimary Health Caredecision makinginformation technologymedical education & trainingprimary careprotocols & guidelinesquality in health care

Identifiers

PMID37945307
PMCPMC10649784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.