ArticleJournal of dental research2023
Preinterventional Third-Molar Assessment Using Robust Machine Learning.
Article in Journal of dental research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Deep learning-assisted creation of a large-scale cone beam computed tomography dataset for the segmentation of impacted mandibular third molar.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Quantitative Assessment of Third Molar Extraction Difficulty and Nerve Injury Risk Using Artificial Intelligence and Image Processing.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Fully automatic AI diagnosis of alveolar bone defect in anterior teeth on CBCT images.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- A machine learning-based predictive model for mandibular third molar extraction difficulty: incorporating multimodal features and SHAP analysis.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Impacted third molars and their influence on second molar pathologies: radiological patterns, statistical analysis, and emerging AI perspectives.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Article
- Applications of artificial intelligence in tooth extraction: A systematic review.Journal of dental sciences · 2026Review
- Article
- Automatic mandibular third molar and mandibular canal relationship determination based on deep learning models for preoperative risk reduction.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- LMCD-OR: a large-scale, multilevel categorized diagnostic dataset for oral radiography.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Article
- Imaging in Third Molar Surgery: A Clinical Update.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Postoperative Complications After Extraction of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: A Clinical Observational Study On Dental Position And Risks.Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community DentistryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) models, especially deep neural networks, are increasingly being used for the analysis of medical images and as a supporting tool for clinical decision-making. In this study, we propose an artificial intelligence system to facilitate dental decision-making for the removal of mandibular third molars (M3M) based on 2-dimensional orthopantograms and the risk assessment of such a procedure. A total of 4,516 panoramic radiographic images collected at the Center of Dental Medicine at the University of Zurich, Switzerland, were used for training the ML model. After image preparation and preprocessing, a spatially dependent U-Net was employed to detect and retrieve the region of the M3M and inferior alveolar nerve (IAN). Image patches identified to contain a M3M were automatically processed by a deep neural network for the classification of M3M superimposition over the IAN (task 1) and M3M root development (task 2). A control evaluation set of 120 images, collected from a different data source than the training data and labeled by 5 dental practitioners, was leveraged to reliably evaluate model performance. By 10-fold cross-validation, we achieved accuracy values of 0.94 and 0.93 for the M3M-IAN superimposition task and the M3M root development task, respectively, and accuracies of 0.9 and 0.87 when evaluated on the control data set, using a ResNet-101 trained in a semisupervised fashion. Matthew's correlation coefficient values of 0.82 and 0.75 for task 1 and task 2, evaluated on the control data set, indicate robust generalization of our model. Depending on the different label combinations of task 1 and task 2, we propose a diagnostic table that suggests whether additional imaging via 3-dimensional cone beam tomography is advisable. Ultimately, computer-aided decision-making tools benefit clinical practice by enabling efficient and risk-reduced decision-making and by supporting less experienced practitioners before the surgical removal of the M3M.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.