ArticleNeuron2023
Benefits of sharing neurophysiology data from the BRAIN Initiative Research Opportunities in Humans Consortium.
Article in Neuron, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Facilitating analysis of open neurophysiology data on the DANDI Archive using large language model tools.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Privacy in perspective: research participants' priorities and concerns related to sharing data generated in human neuroscience studies.Neuroethics · 2025Article
- Facilitating analysis of open neurophysiology data on the DANDI Archive using large language model tools.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Conflicting Interests and New Frontiers: A Role for Virtue Ethics in Cutting Edge Brain Research with Humans.Neuroethics · 2025Article
- Multiscale brain modeling: bridging microscopic and macroscopic brain dynamics for clinical and technological applications.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2025Review
- The BRAIN Initiative data-sharing ecosystem: Characteristics, challenges, benefits, and opportunities.eLife · 2024Article
- BRAIN @ 10: A decade of innovation.Neuron · 2024Article
- Ethical considerations for integrating multimodal computer perception and neurotechnology.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sharing human brain data can yield scientific benefits, but because of various disincentives, only a fraction of these data is currently shared. We profile three successful data-sharing experiences from the NIH BRAIN Initiative Research Opportunities in Humans (ROH) Consortium and demonstrate benefits to data producers and to users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.