Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37944261›Full record

ArticleJournal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism2024

Estimation of target occupancy in repeated dosing design studies using positron emission tomography: Biases due to target upregulation.

Eugenii A Rabiner, Roger N Gunn

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Quantifying VMAT2 target occupancy at effective valbenazine doses and comparing to a novel VMAT2 inhibitor: a translational PET study.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eugenii A RabinerInvicro, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3612-6687
Roger N GunnInvicro, London, UK.
Invicro (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET) has become indispensable in the quantification of target engagement by brain targeting medications. The relationship between the drug plasma concentration (or drug dose administered) and target occupancy determined during a PET occupancy study has provided valuable information for the assessment of novel pharmaceuticals in the early phases of drug development. Such information is also critical for the understanding of the mechanisms of action and side-effect profile of approved medication commonly used in the clinic. Occupancy studies conducted following repeated drug dosing (RD) can produce systematic differences from those conducted following single drug dose (SD), differences that have not been adequately explored. We have hypothesised that when differences are observed between RD and SD studies, they are related to changes in target density induced by repeated drug accumulation. We have developed a modified occupancy model to account for potential changes in target density and tested it on a sample dataset. We found that target upregulation can parsimoniously explain the differences in drug affinity estimated in SD and RD studies. Our findings have implications for the interpretation of RD occupancy data in the literature and the relationship between specific target occupancy levels and drug efficacy and tolerability.

Indexed as

BrainPositron-Emission TomographyBiasDose-Response Relationship, DrugUp-RegulationPositron emission tomography (PET)receptor occupancyreceptor upregulation

Identifiers

PMID37944261
PMCPMC10981403
OpenAlexW4388516834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.