Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37943880›Full record

SynthesisPLoS neglected tropical diseases2023

A systematic review of the clinical profile of patients with bubonic plague and the outcome measures used in research settings.

Josephine Bourner, Lovarivelo Andriamarohasina, Alex Salam, Nzelle Delphine Kayem, Rindra Randremanana, Piero Olliaro

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Josephine BournerISARIC, Pandemic Sciences Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4687-8380
Lovarivelo AndriamarohasinaInstitut Pasteur de Madagascar, Antananarivo, Madagascar.
Alex SalamISARIC, Pandemic Sciences Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Nzelle Delphine KayemISARIC, Pandemic Sciences Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Rindra RandremananaInstitut Pasteur de Madagascar, Antananarivo, Madagascar.
Piero OlliaroISARIC, Pandemic Sciences Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
University of Oxford · GBInstitut Pasteur de Madagascar · MG

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPlague is a zoonotic disease that, despite affecting humans for more than 5000 years, has historically been the subject of limited drug development activity. Drugs that are currently recommended in treatment guidelines have been approved based on animal studies alone-no pivotal clinical trials in humans have yet been completed. As a result of the sparse clinical research attention received, there are a number of methodological challenges that need to be addressed in order to facilitate the collection of clinical trial data that can meaningfully inform clinicians and policy-makers. One such challenge is the identification of clinically-relevant endpoints, which are informed by understanding the clinical characterisation of the disease-how it presents and evolves over time, and important patient outcomes, and how these can be modified by treatment. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsThis systematic review aims to summarise the clinical profile of 1343 patients with bubonic plague described in 87 publications, identified by searching bibliographic databases for studies that meet pre-defined eligibility criteria. The majority of studies were individual case reports. A diverse group of signs and symptoms were reported at baseline and post-baseline timepoints-the most common of which was presence of a bubo, for which limited descriptive and longitudinal information was available. Death occurred in 15% of patients; although this varied from an average 10% in high-income countries to an average 17% in low- and middle-income countries. The median time to death was 1 day, ranging from 0 to 16 days. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This systematic review elucidates the restrictions that limited disease characterisation places on clinical trials for infectious diseases such as plague, which not only impacts the definition of trial endpoints but has the knock-on effect of challenging the interpretation of a trial's results. For this reason and despite interventional trials for plague having taken place, questions around optimal treatment for plague persist.

Indexed as

PlagueAnimalsHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CareZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID37943880
PMCPMC10662759
OpenAlexW4388520789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.