ArticlePloS one2023
An international consensus on effective, inclusive, and career-spanning short-format training in the life sciences and beyond.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ten simple rules to build genomics capacity for routine laboratory practice in the Global South.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Reimagining plant science training in the era of generative artificial intelligence: a global perspective.The Plant cell · 2026Review
- Leveraging training expertise to build capacity in computational personalised medicine.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Challenges in bioinformatics education courses organization.Biophysical reviews · 2025Review
- Ten simple rules for training by researchers for researchers in a rapidly evolving workforce.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- There's never been a better time to be a STEM educator.Genetics · 2025Article
- Modular, focused data science education improves biomedical learners' abilities: A study of the Data and Analytics for Research Training (DART) program.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Learning and teaching biological data science in the Bioconductor community.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Opportunities and considerations for using artificial intelligence in bioinformatics education.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Article
- Shifting institutional culture to develop climate solutions with Open Science.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Meeting the challenge of genomic analysis: a collaboratively developed workshop for pangenomics and topological data analysis.Bioinformatics advances · 2024Article
- The five pillars of computational reproducibility: bioinformatics and beyond.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- An international consensus on effective, inclusive, and career-spanning short-format training in the life sciences and beyond.PloS one · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine (STEMM) fields change rapidly and are increasingly interdisciplinary. Commonly, STEMM practitioners use short-format training (SFT) such as workshops and short courses for upskilling and reskilling, but unaddressed challenges limit SFT's effectiveness and inclusiveness. Education researchers, students in SFT courses, and organizations have called for research and strategies that can strengthen SFT in terms of effectiveness, inclusiveness, and accessibility across multiple dimensions. This paper describes the project that resulted in a consensus set of 14 actionable recommendations to systematically strengthen SFT. A diverse international group of 30 experts in education, accessibility, and life sciences came together from 10 countries to develop recommendations that can help strengthen SFT globally. Participants, including representation from some of the largest life science training programs globally, assembled findings in the educational sciences and encompassed the experiences of several of the largest life science SFT programs. The 14 recommendations were derived through a Delphi method, where consensus was achieved in real time as the group completed a series of meetings and tasks designed to elicit specific recommendations. Recommendations cover the breadth of SFT contexts and stakeholder groups and include actions for instructors (e.g., make equity and inclusion an ethical obligation), programs (e.g., centralize infrastructure for assessment and evaluation), as well as organizations and funders (e.g., professionalize training SFT instructors; deploy SFT to counter inequity). Recommendations are aligned with a purpose-built framework-"The Bicycle Principles"-that prioritizes evidenced-based teaching, inclusiveness, and equity, as well as the ability to scale, share, and sustain SFT. We also describe how the Bicycle Principles and recommendations are consistent with educational change theories and can overcome systemic barriers to delivering consistently effective, inclusive, and career-spanning SFT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.