Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37943667›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2023

How Robust Is the Ligand Binding Transition State?

Samik Bose, Samuel D Lotz, Indrajit Deb, Megan Shuck, Kin Sing Stephen Lee, Alex Dickson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Structure and conformational dynamics of the Pseudomonas CbrA transceptor.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. ModBindProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Structure and conformational dynamics of thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Samik BoseDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, United States.
Samuel D LotzDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6159-615X
Indrajit DebDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, United States.
Megan ShuckDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1303-853X
Kin Sing Stephen LeeDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, United States.
Alex DicksonDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9640-1380

Funding

Revealing the Ligand Binding Landscape with Advanced Molecular Simulation MethodsR01GM130794 · NIGMS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DICKSON, ALEXANDER · 2018 to 2025
$2.8M
Development of soluble epoxide hydrolase inhibitors for the treatment of Alzheimer's diseaseR01AG080186 · NIA · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Kin Sing Stephen Lee · 2023 to 2026
$2.6M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG080186NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM130794
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For many drug targets, it has been shown that the kinetics of drug binding (e.g., on rate and off rate) is more predictive of drug efficacy than thermodynamic quantities alone. This motivates the development of predictive computational models that can be used to optimize compounds on the basis of their kinetics. The structural details underpinning these computational models are found not only in the bound state but also in the short-lived ligand binding transition states. Although transition states cannot be directly observed experimentally due to their extremely short lifetimes, recent successes have demonstrated that modeling the ligand binding transition state is possible with the help of enhanced sampling molecular dynamics methods. Previously, we generated unbinding paths for an inhibitor of soluble epoxide hydrolase (sEH) with a residence time of 11 min. Here, we computationally modeled unbinding events with the weighted ensemble method REVO (resampling of ensembles by variation optimization) for five additional inhibitors of sEH with residence times ranging from 14.25 to 31.75 min, with average prediction accuracy within an order of magnitude. The unbinding ensembles are analyzed in detail, focusing on features of the ligand binding transition state ensembles (TSEs). We find that ligands with similar bound poses can show significant differences in their ligand binding TSEs, in terms of their spatial distribution and protein-ligand interactions. However, we also find similarities across the TSEs when examining more general features such as ligand degrees of freedom. Together these findings show significant challenges for rational, kinetics-based drug design.

Indexed as

Drug DesignMolecular Dynamics SimulationKineticsLigandsProtein BindingThermodynamicsLigands

Identifiers

PMID37943667
PMCPMC11059145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.