Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37943593›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2023

Feasibility of Using Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) to Collect Daily Experiences of Parent-Child Dyads: Ecological Momentary Assessment Study.

Yola El Dahr, Florence Perquier, Madison Moloney, Guyyunge Woo, Roksana Dobrin-De Grace, Daniela Carvalho, Nicole Addario, Emily E Cameron, Leslie E Roos, Peter Szatmari and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Beyond snapshots: A systematic review of dyadic and triadic parent-adolescent ecological momentary assessment studies across diverse and general populations.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yola El DahrCundill Centre for Child and Youth Depression, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2300-0042
Florence PerquierCundill Centre for Child and Youth Depression, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9622-3652
Madison MoloneyCundill Centre for Child and Youth Depression, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6462-7220
Guyyunge WooCundill Centre for Child and Youth Depression, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0492-647X
Roksana Dobrin-De GraceCundill Centre for Child and Youth Depression, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1269-2058
Daniela CarvalhoCundill Centre for Child and Youth Depression, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8970-4833
Nicole AddarioCundill Centre for Child and Youth Depression, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5425-3730
Emily E CameronDepartment of Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9153-0565
Leslie E RoosDepartment of Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7083-4017
Peter SzatmariCundill Centre for Child and Youth Depression, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1763-067X
Madison AitkenCundill Centre for Child and Youth Depression, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4921-5462

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntensive longitudinal data collection, including ecological momentary assessment (EMA), has the potential to reduce recall biases, collect more ecologically valid data, and increase our understanding of dynamic associations between variables. EMA is typically administered using an application that is downloaded on participants' devices, which presents cost and privacy concerns that may limit its use. Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap), a web-based survey application freely available to nonprofit organizations, may allow researchers to overcome these barriers; however, at present, little guidance is available to researchers regarding the setup of EMA in REDCap, especially for those who are new to using REDCap or lack advanced programming expertise.

objectiveWe provide an example of a simplified EMA setup in REDCap. This study aims to demonstrate the feasibility of this approach. We provide information on survey completion and user behavior in a sample of parents and children recruited across Canada.

methodsWe recruited 66 parents and their children (aged 9-13 years old) from an existing longitudinal cohort study to participate in a study on risk and protective factors for children's mental health. Parents received survey prompts (morning and evening) by email or SMS text message for 14 days, twice daily. Each survey prompt contained 2 sections, one for parents and one for children to complete.

resultsThe completion rates were good (mean 82%, SD 8%) and significantly higher on weekdays than weekends and in dyads with girls than dyads with boys. Children were available to respond to their own survey questions most of the time (in 1134/1498, 75.7% of surveys submitted). The number of assessments submitted was significantly higher, and response times were significantly faster among participants who selected SMS text message survey notifications compared to email survey notifications. The average response time was 47.0 minutes after the initial survey notification, and the use of reminder messages increased survey completion.

conclusionsOur results support the feasibility of using REDCap for EMA studies with parents and children. REDCap also has features that can accommodate EMA studies by recruiting participants across multiple time zones and providing different survey delivery methods. Offering the option of SMS text message survey notifications and reminders may be an important way to increase completion rates and the timeliness of responses. REDCap is a potentially useful tool for researchers wishing to implement EMA in settings in which cost or privacy are current barriers. Researchers should weigh these benefits with the potential limitations of REDCap and this design, including staff time to set up, monitor, and clean the data outputs of the project.

Indexed as

ambulatory assessmentchildrenecological momentary assessmentlongitudinalparentssurvey

Identifiers

PMID37943593
PMCPMC10667976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.