Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37943590›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2023

Built Environments to Support Rehabilitation for People With Stroke From the Hospital to the Home (B-Sure): Protocol for a Mixed Method Participatory Co-Design Study.

Maya Kylén, Jodi Sturge, Ruby Lipson-Smith, Steven M Schmidt, Hélène Pessah-Rasmussen, Tony Svensson, Laila de Vries, Julie Bernhardt, Marie Elf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Stakeholder Perspectives on Built Environmental Factors to Support Stroke Rehabilitation and Return to Everyday Life.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maya Kylén *Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2887-3674
Jodi Sturge *Department of Design, Production and Management, Faculty of Engineering Technology, University of Twente, Twente, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7598-1558
Ruby Lipson-Smith *The MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Development, Western Sydney University, Westmead, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1702-8144
Steven M SchmidtDepartment of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0878-735X
Hélène Pessah-Rasmussen *Department of Neurology, Rehabilitation Medicine, Memory Clinic and Geriatrics, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0241-4798
Tony SvenssonSchool of Information and Engineering, Dalarna University, Borlänge, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4360-1207
Laila de VriesSchool of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2441-107X
Julie Bernhardt *The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2787-8484
Marie Elf *School of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7044-8896

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA global trend is to move rehabilitation closer to people's neighborhoods and homes. Still, little attention has been given to how the built environment outside the hospital setting might impact rehabilitation and recovery for stroke survivors.

objectiveThe overarching objective of this project is to develop conceptual models of built environments that support stroke rehabilitation and recovery outside the hospital setting. Specifically, the project will explore factors and characteristics of the built environment that support people with stroke and their families and identify innovative built environments that can be designed for local health care. The project will examine facilitators and obstacles for implementing built environmental solutions and evaluate the potential benefits, feasibility, and acceptability.

methodsThe project uses a mixed methods design approach with 3 phases. In phase 1, factors and characteristics of the built environment for rehabilitation will be identified. Based on the results from phase 1, phase 2 will involve co-designing prototypes of environments to support the rehabilitation process for people with stroke. Finally, the prototypes will be evaluated in phase 3. Qualitative and quantitative methods will include a literature review, a concept mapping (CM) study, stakeholder interviews, prototype development, and testing. The project will use multidimensional scaling, hierarchical cluster analysis, descriptive statistics for quantitative data, and content analysis for qualitative data. Location analysis will rely on the location-allocation model for network problems, and the rule-based analysis will be based on geographic information systems data.

resultsAs of the submission of this protocol, ethical approval for the CM study and the interview study has been obtained. Data collection is planned to start in September 2023 and the workshops later in the same year. The scoping review is ongoing from January 2023. The CM study is ongoing and will be finalized in the spring of 2024. We expect to finish the data analysis in the second half of 2024. The project is a 3-year project and will continue until December 2025.

conclusionsWe aim to determine how new environments could better support a person's control over their day, environment, goals, and ultimately control over their recovery and rehabilitation activities. This "taking charge" approach would have the greatest chance of transferring the care closer to the patient's home. By co-designing with multiple stakeholders, we aim to create solutions with the potential for rapid implementation. The project's outcomes may target other people with frail health after a hospital stay or older persons in Sweden and anywhere else. The impact and social benefits include collaboration between important stakeholders to explore how new environments can support the transition to local health care, co-design, and test of new conceptual models of environments that can promote health and well-being for people post stroke. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/52489.

Indexed as

accessibilitybuilt environmentgood quality and local caremeaningful activitiesparticipationparticipatory co-designperson-centeredself-efficacystroke rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID37943590
PMCPMC10667985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.