ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2023
Development of an Automated Electroretinography Analysis Approach.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- The oscillatory response of the electroretinogram and neuronal adaptation.Acta ophthalmologica · 2026Review
- L-DOPA Promotes Post-Treatment Neurovascular and Synaptic Homeostasis in Early Diabetic Retinopathy.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- L-DOPA treatment promotes sustained neurovascular and synaptic homeostasis in the diabetic retina.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Sustained Benefit of Short-Term Levodopa Treatment on Inner Retinal Function in Patients With Diabetes.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Electroretinography (ERG) is used to assess retinal function in ophthalmology clinics and animal models of ocular disease; however, analyzing ERG waveforms can be a time-intensive process with interobserver variability. We developed ERGAssist, an automated approach, to perform non-subjective and repeatable feature identification ("marking") of the ERG waveform. Methods: The automated approach denoised the recorded waveforms and then located the b-wave after applying a lowpass filter. If an a-wave was present, the lowpass filter wave was also used to help locate the a-wave, which was considered the initial large negative response after the flash stimuli. Oscillatory potentials (OPs) were found using a bandpass filter on the denoised waveform. We used two cohorts. One was a Coherence cohort that consisted of ERGs with eight dark-adapted and three light-adapted stimuli in Brown Norway rats (-6 to 1.5 log cd·s/m2). The Verification cohort consisted of control and diabetic (DM) Long Evans rats. We examined retinal function using a five-step dark-adapted protocol (-3 to 1.9 log cd·s/m2). Results: ERGAssist showed a strong correlation with manual markings of ERG features in our Coherence dataset, including the amplitudes (a-wave: r2 = 0.99; b-wave: r2 = 0.99; OP: r2 = 0.92) and implicit times (a-wave: r2 = 0.96; b-wave: r2 = 0.90; OP: r2 = 0.96). In the Verification cohort, both approaches detected differences between control and DM animals and found longer OP implicit times (P < 0.0001) in DM animals. Conclusions: These results provide verification of ERGAssist to identify features of the full-field ERG. Translational Relevance: This ERG analysis approach can increase the rigor of basic science studies designed to investigate retinal function using full-field ERG. To aid the community, we have developed an open-source graphical user interface (GUI) implementing the methods presented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.