Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37943499›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2023

Prediction of body condition in Jersey dairy cattle from 3D-images using machine learning techniques.

Rasmus B Stephansen, Coralia I V Manzanilla-Pech, Grum Gebreyesus, Goutam Sahana, Jan Lassen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Recent Advances in Vision-Based Beef Cattle Body Measurement Technologies.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Computer vision algorithms to help decision-making in cattle production.Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Cattle Body Size Measurement Based on DUOS-PointNet+.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rasmus B StephansenCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, 8000-Aarhus C, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9687-0833
Coralia I V Manzanilla-PechCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, 8000-Aarhus C, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1552-212X
Grum GebreyesusCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, 8000-Aarhus C, Denmark.
Goutam SahanaCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, 8000-Aarhus C, Denmark.
Jan LassenCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, 8000-Aarhus C, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The body condition of dairy cows is a crucial health and welfare indicator that is widely acknowledged. Dairy herds with a well-management body condition tend to have more fertile and functional cows. Therefore, routine recording of high-quality body condition phenotypes is required. Automated prediction of body condition from 3D images can be a cost-effective approach to current manual recording by technicians. Using 3D-images, we aimed to build a reliable prediction model of body condition for Jersey cows. The dataset consisted of 808 individual Jersey cows with 2,253 phenotypes from three herds in Denmark. Body condition was scored on a 1 to 9 scale and transformed into a 1 to 5 scale with 0.5-unit differences. The cows' back images were recorded using a 3D camera (Microsoft Xbox One Kinect v2). We used contour and back height features from 3D-images as predictors, together with class predictors (evaluator, herd, evaluation round, parity, lactation week). The performance of machine learning algorithms was assessed using H2O AutoML algorithm (h2o.ai). Based on outputs from AutoML, DeepLearning (DL; multi-layer feedforward artificial neural network) and Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) algorithms were implemented for classification and regression tasks and compared on prediction accuracy. In addition, we compared the Partial Least Square (PLS) method for regression. The training and validation data were divided either through a random 7:3 split for 10 replicates or by allocating two herds for training and one herd for validation. The accuracy of classification models showed the DL algorithm performed better than the GBM algorithm. The DL model achieved a mean accuracy of 48.1% on the exact phenotype and 93.5% accuracy with a 0.5-unit deviation. The performances of PLS and DL regression methods were comparable, with mean coefficient of determination of 0.67 and 0.66, respectively. When we used data from two herds for training and the third herd as validation, we observed a slightly decreased prediction accuracy compared to the 7:3 split of the dataset. The accuracies for DL and PLS in the herd validation scenario were > 38% on the exact phenotype and > 87% accuracy with 0.5-unit deviation. This study demonstrates the feasibility of a reliable body condition prediction model in Jersey cows using 3D-images. The approach developed can be used for reliable and frequent prediction of cows' body condition to improve dairy farm management and genetic evaluations.

Indexed as

FertilityLactationAlgorithmsAnimalsCattleDairyingFemaleMachine LearningMilkNeural Networks, ComputerPregnancyBody ConditionHerd ManagementHigh Throughput PhenotypingJersey Dairy CattleMachine LearningPrecision Livestock Farming

Identifiers

PMID37943499
PMCPMC10808082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.