Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37943493›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2024

Digital postoperative follow-up after colorectal resection: a multi-center preliminary qualitative study on a patient reporting and monitoring application.

Sébastien Bertoni, Jean-Philippe M M K Magema, Bart Van Geluwe, Nora Abbes Orabi, Gabriele Bislenghi, André D'Hoore, Albert Wolthuis

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sébastien BertoniGeneral and Digestive Surgery Unit, CHU-UCL Namur, Site Dinant, 5500, Dinant, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8066-0639
Jean-Philippe M M K MagemaGeneral and Digestive Surgery Unit, CHU-UCL Namur, Site Dinant, 5500, Dinant, Belgium.
Bart Van GeluweAbdominal Surgery Unit, AZ Groeninge, 8500, Kortrijk, Belgium.
Nora Abbes OrabiGeneral and Digestive Surgery Unit, CHR Mons-Hainaut, 7022, Mons, Belgium.
Gabriele BislenghiDepartment of Abdominal Surgery, UZ Leuven Campus Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, 3000, Louvain, Belgium.
André D'HooreDepartment of Abdominal Surgery, UZ Leuven Campus Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, 3000, Louvain, Belgium.
Albert WolthuisDepartment of Abdominal Surgery, UZ Leuven Campus Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, 3000, Louvain, Belgium. albert.wolthuis@uzleuven.be.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of minimally invasive colorectal surgery in the last decades led to a decrease in length of hospital stay. However, readmission and postoperative complications were still observed. Several studies have shown that close postoperative follow-up is required to decrease postoperative morbidity through patient education and by detecting early signs of complications. To help in this task, multiple monitoring programs have been set up to follow patients at home, allowing detection of several complications at an early stage. To evaluate acceptance, satisfaction, usability, compliance and safety of a mobile application following postoperative colorectal patients during the first 15 days post-discharge from hospital. A mobile application enabling the communication between the patient and medical staff during the recovery phase was developed and tested in four hospitals. Patients who underwent a colorectal resection were included in this prospective qualitative study. Questionnaires to assess satisfaction and usability were handed out to patients at the end of the test period. Overall, 118 patients (52% females, median age 52.5 years) were included. Median adherence-rate during 15 days was 89.6%. Satisfaction-rate for the application was 76% and usability was high. Overall, 1220 notifications were collected, of which 722 were orange, 466 red and 32 purple, colours used to rate the severeness of complaints. We analyzed the most common notifications, showing trends in different subgroups of the study with higher risks of complications (pain (409 notifications), abnormal stools (196 notifications), and wound problems (118 notifications)). A mobile application could be used to follow patients at home after colorectal resection. Future studies should evaluate whether these applications can detect complications and prevent readmission.

Indexed as

AftercareColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPatient DischargePostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesColorectal surgeryFeasibilityHome postoperative monitoringMobile application

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.