Observational studyIndian journal of pediatrics2025
Clinical Utility of Proband Only Clinical Exome Sequencing in Neurodevelopmental Disorders.
Observational study in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic and clinical utility of exome sequencing and chromosomal microarray in children with GDD/iD: a meta-analysis.Annals of medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Clinical Exome Sequencing as a Key Diagnostic Tool: A Rare de novoMolecular syndromology · 2026Article
- Assessing the impact of exome sequencing on diagnostic yield in a large cohort of Brazilian patients.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chromosomal microarray is recommended as the first line of investigation in neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs). However, advances in next-generation sequencing have unraveled more than 900 genes associated with NDDs, thus improving the genetic diagnosis. Therefore, this study was conducted to explore the utility of clinical exome sequencing (CES) in NDDs from a tertiary care centre in India. A retrospective observational analysis of 78 children with NDDs for whom CES was performed between 2017 and 2021 was conducted. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) criteria were used to classify the variants. The mean age was 5.8 ± 3.6 y, and 42 (53%) were male. Pathogenic, likely pathogenic, and variants of uncertain significance (VUS) were observed in 22 (28.2%), 10 (12.8%), and 26 (33.3%) patients, respectively, which included five copy number variants. The diagnostic yield for pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants in NDDs by CES was 41%, which was reasonably high.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.