ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024
Analysis of Ice-Binding Protein Evolution.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Discovering novel ice-binding proteins (IBPs) is important for understanding the evolution of IBPs but it is difficult to determine where resources should be directed in the search for novel IBPs. For this reason, we developed a simple bioinformatic approach for aiding in the determination of where to direct efforts in the search for IBPs. First, BLAST is used to obtain a candidate list of putative IBPs. Next, phylogenetic trees are constructed to map the candidate list of putative IBPs to determine if any patterns are forming. These candidate putative IBPs and their patterns are then assessed through the production of ancestral sequences and reverse BLAST searches, in addition to the use of IBP calculators, to determine which sequences should be cut to produce the final putative IBP list. Finally, we explain an avenue to investigate these putative IBPs further for the development of hypotheses on their evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37943462What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.