ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2024
Reliable and fast automatic artifact rejection of Long-Term EEG recordings based on Isolation Forest.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in neurofibromatosis type I: diagnostic and therapeutic opportunities.Journal of applied genetics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Long-term electroencephalogram (Long-Term EEG) has the capacity to monitor over a long period, making it a valuable tool in medical institutions. However, due to the large volume of patient data, selecting clean data segments from raw Long-Term EEG for further analysis is an extremely time-consuming and labor-intensive task. Furthermore, the various actions of patients during recording make it difficult to use algorithms to denoise part of the EEG data, and thus lead to the rejection of these data. Therefore, tools for the quick rejection of heavily corrupted epochs in Long-Term EEG records are highly beneficial. In this paper, a new reliable and fast automatic artifact rejection method for Long-Term EEG based on Isolation Forest (IF) is proposed. Specifically, the IF algorithm is repetitively applied to detect outliers in the EEG data, and the boundary of inliers is promptly adjusted by using a statistical indicator to make the algorithm proceed in an iterative manner. The iteration is terminated when the distance metric between clean epochs and artifact-corrupted epochs remains unchanged. Six statistical indicators (i.e., min, max, median, mean, kurtosis, and skewness) are evaluated by setting them as centroid to adjust the boundary during iteration, and the proposed method is compared with several state-of-the-art methods on a retrospectively collected dataset. The experimental results indicate that utilizing the min value of data as the centroid yields the most optimal performance, and the proposed method is highly efficacious and reliable in the automatic artifact rejection of Long-Term EEG, as it significantly improves the overall data quality. Furthermore, the proposed method surpasses compared methods on most data segments with poor data quality, demonstrating its superior capacity to enhance the data quality of the heavily corrupted data. Besides, owing to the linear time complexity of IF, the proposed method is much faster than other methods, thus providing an advantage when dealing with extensive datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37943419What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.