ArticleAnalytical chemistry2023
High-Throughput Liquid Chromatographic Analysis Using a Segmented Flow Injector with a 1 s Cycle Time.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Utilizing Venturi effect for automated high-throughput droplet-MS from well plates.The Analyst · 2026Article
- Fast Chemical Analysis of Droplets Unlocked by Ultra-Fast Ion Mobility Spectrometry.Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
- High-Throughput Monoclonal Antibody Peptide Mapping Using 15-s HPLC Gradients Coupled with Cyclic Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry.Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Improving the performance of HPLC-MS using radial flow splitting columns: the analysis of caffeine in energy drinks.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2025Article
- The utilization of open-source microcontroller boards and single-board computers in liquid chromatography.Journal of separation science · 2024Review
- High-Throughput Capillary Liquid Chromatography Using a Droplet Injection and Application to Reaction Screening.Analytical chemistry · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
High-throughput screening (HTS) workflows are revolutionizing many fields, including drug discovery, reaction discovery and optimization, diagnostics, sensing, and enzyme engineering. Liquid chromatography (LC) is commonly deployed during HTS to reduce matrix effects, distinguish isomers, and preconcentrate prior to detection, but LC separation time often limits throughput. Although subsecond LC separations have been demonstrated, they are rarely utilized during HTS due to limitations associated with the speed of common autosamplers. In this work, these limits are overcome by utilizing droplet microfluidics for sample introduction. In the method, a train of samples segmented by air are continuously pumped into the inlet of an LC injection valve that is actuated once each sample fills the sample loop. Coupled with 2.1 mm diameter × 5 mm long columns packed with 2.7 μm superficially porous C18 particles operated at 5 mL/min, the injector enabled separation of 3 components at 1 s/sample and analysis of a 96-well plate in 1.6 min with <2% peak area relative standard deviation. Analyte-dependent carryover was minimized by including wash droplets composed of organic solvent in between sample droplets. High-throughput LC coupled with mass spectrometric detection using the segmented flow injector was applied to a screen of inhibitors of a cytochrome P450-catalyzed hydroxylation reaction. Measurements of the reaction substrate and product concentrations made using fast LC with the segmented flow injector correlated well with measurements made using a more conventional, 3 min LC method. These results demonstrate the potential for droplet microfluidics to be used for sample introduction during high-throughput LC analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.