ArticleEuropean radiology2024
Voxel-based morphometry in single subjects without a scanner-specific normal database using a convolutional neural network.
Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Geometric Fragility in Alzheimer's Disease: Probing the Loss of Hippocampal Hierarchical Abstraction via Contrastive Point Cloud Modeling.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Searching for the grail: may machine learning be a road to clinical use of brain MRI segmentation?European radiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesReliable detection of disease-specific atrophy in individual T1w-MRI by voxel-based morphometry (VBM) requires scanner-specific normal databases (NDB), which often are not available. The aim of this retrospective study was to design, train, and test a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) for single-subject VBM without the need for a NDB (CNN-VBM). MATERIALS AND
methodsThe training dataset comprised 8945 T1w scans from 65 different scanners. The gold standard VBM maps were obtained by conventional VBM with a scanner-specific NDB for each of the 65 scanners. CNN-VBM was tested in an independent dataset comprising healthy controls (n = 37) and subjects with Alzheimer's disease (AD, n = 51) or frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD, n = 30). A scanner-specific NDB for the generation of the gold standard VBM maps was available also for the test set. The technical performance of CNN-VBM was characterized by the Dice coefficient of CNN-VBM maps relative to VBM maps from scanner-specific VBM. For clinical testing, VBM maps were categorized visually according to the clinical diagnoses in the test set by two independent readers, separately for both VBM methods.
resultsThe VBM maps from CNN-VBM were similar to the scanner-specific VBM maps (median Dice coefficient 0.85, interquartile range [0.81, 0.90]). Overall accuracy of the visual categorization of the VBM maps for the detection of AD or FTLD was 89.8% for CNN-VBM and 89.0% for scanner-specific VBM.
conclusionCNN-VBM without NDB provides a similar performance in the detection of AD- and FTLD-specific atrophy as conventional VBM. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: A deep convolutional neural network for voxel-based morphometry eliminates the need of scanner-specific normal databases without relevant performance loss and, therefore, could pave the way for the widespread clinical use of voxel-based morphometry to support the diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases. KEY POINTS: • The need of normal databases is a barrier for widespread use of voxel-based brain morphometry. • A convolutional neural network achieved a similar performance for detection of atrophy than conventional voxel-based morphometry. • Convolutional neural networks can pave the way for widespread clinical use of voxel-based morphometry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.