ArticleCureus2023
Proof of Efficacy Study to Evaluate an Ayurvedic Formulation in the Treatment of Allergic Rhinitis: An Open Label Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Traditional Chinese Medicine for Pediatric Allergic Diseases.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2025Review
- Ayurveda Management of Allergic Rhinitis: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
- Immunomodulatory Effects of a Herbo-Mineral Ayurvedic Formulation in Experimental Models.Cureus · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAllergic rhinitis is largely treated by using antihistamines and nasal sprays, either alone or in combination. However, these measures ease out the symptoms but do not address causative factors, and have their share of side effects and limitations. An Ayurvedic herbo-mineral formulation, IMMBO, has been reported to be effective in treating allergic rhinitis.
objectiveThe present study was carried out to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of the Ayurvedic herbo-mineral formulation in comparison with a fixed-dose combination of levocetirizine and montelukast.
methodThis was a randomized, comparative, clinical study carried out on 250 patients at a medical college in India. The patients were enrolled according to the eligibility criteria of the study and randomized into two groups, to receive either Ayurvedic herbo-mineral formulation, IMMBO, or a combination of levocetirizine and montelukast for 28 days. Total nasal symptom score (TNSS) and Immunoglobulin E (IgE) were calculated for evaluation of efficacy parameters. Result: At the end of therapy both IMMBO and levocetirizine and montelukast combination showed significant improvement in TNSS in both treated population and per protocol population. The IMMBO group had a statistically higher reduction in TNSSs compared to the levocetirizine + montelukast group (-5.70 vs. -3.31; p<0.01). There was a statistically significant difference in the reduction of IgE levels between the groups (-351.54 vs. -208.79; p<0.05). Conclusion: The findings of this study establish prima facie evidence about the efficacy and safety of Ayurvedic formulation. However, the said Ayurvedic formulation needs to be further developed scientifically.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.