Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37942358›Full record

ArticleGeburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde2023

The Endocrine Treatment Landscape for Patients with HR+ HER2- Early-stage Breast Cancer in Germany Before the Introduction of CDK4/6 Inhibitor Therapy - A Real-World Analysis.

Naiba Nabieva, Falk Altmann, Klaus Apel, Dirk-Toralf Baerens, Michaela Beha, Antje Belau, Steffi Busch, Dagmar Guth, Georg Heinrich, Janine Kreiss-Sender and 10 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06697938 (Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Compared to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Luminal-Type Locally Advanced Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06697938 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Compared to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Luminal-Type Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: A Clinical Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorSichuan Cancer Hospital and Research InstituteRan2024 to 2027Enrolled148ConditionsBreast CancerArmsPreoperative SBRT for the Primary Lesion of Breast Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Naiba NabievaNovartis Pharma GmbH, Nürnberg, Germany.
Falk AltmannBerufsverband Niedergelassener und ambulant tätiger Gynäkologischer Onkologen in Deutschland e.V., Neuenhagen bei Berlin, Germany.
Klaus ApelBerufsverband Niedergelassener und ambulant tätiger Gynäkologischer Onkologen in Deutschland e.V., Neuenhagen bei Berlin, Germany.
Dirk-Toralf BaerensBerufsverband Niedergelassener und ambulant tätiger Gynäkologischer Onkologen in Deutschland e.V., Neuenhagen bei Berlin, Germany.
Michaela BehaBerufsverband Niedergelassener und ambulant tätiger Gynäkologischer Onkologen in Deutschland e.V., Neuenhagen bei Berlin, Germany.
Antje BelauBerufsverband Niedergelassener und ambulant tätiger Gynäkologischer Onkologen in Deutschland e.V., Neuenhagen bei Berlin, Germany.
Steffi BuschBerufsverband Niedergelassener und ambulant tätiger Gynäkologischer Onkologen in Deutschland e.V., Neuenhagen bei Berlin, Germany.
Dagmar GuthBerufsverband Niedergelassener und ambulant tätiger Gynäkologischer Onkologen in Deutschland e.V., Neuenhagen bei Berlin, Germany.
Georg HeinrichBerufsverband Niedergelassener und ambulant tätiger Gynäkologischer Onkologen in Deutschland e.V., Neuenhagen bei Berlin, Germany.
Janine Kreiss-SenderBerufsverband Niedergelassener und ambulant tätiger Gynäkologischer Onkologen in Deutschland e.V., Neuenhagen bei Berlin, Germany.
Susanne MarkmannBerufsverband Niedergelassener und ambulant tätiger Gynäkologischer Onkologen in Deutschland e.V., Neuenhagen bei Berlin, Germany.
Andreas OlbermannBerufsverband Niedergelassener und ambulant tätiger Gynäkologischer Onkologen in Deutschland e.V., Neuenhagen bei Berlin, Germany.
Gülten Oskay-ÖzcelikBerufsverband Niedergelassener und ambulant tätiger Gynäkologischer Onkologen in Deutschland e.V., Neuenhagen bei Berlin, Germany.
Beatrix SchubackBerufsverband Niedergelassener und ambulant tätiger Gynäkologischer Onkologen in Deutschland e.V., Neuenhagen bei Berlin, Germany.
Dieter Steinfeld-BirgBerufsverband Niedergelassener und ambulant tätiger Gynäkologischer Onkologen in Deutschland e.V., Neuenhagen bei Berlin, Germany.
Claudia QuieringNovartis Pharma GmbH, Nürnberg, Germany.
Ferenc KissNovartis Pharma GmbH, Nürnberg, Germany.
Julia KreuzederNovartis Pharma GmbH, Nürnberg, Germany.
Paolo NutiBerufsverband Niedergelassener und ambulant tätiger Gynäkologischer Onkologen in Deutschland e.V., Neuenhagen bei Berlin, Germany.
Jörg SchillingBerufsverband Niedergelassener und ambulant tätiger Gynäkologischer Onkologen in Deutschland e.V., Neuenhagen bei Berlin, Germany.
Berufsverband Niedergelassener Gynäkologischer Onkologen · DENovartis (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: While premenopausal patients with HR+ HER2- early breast cancer are treated with tamoxifen +/- ovarian suppression with a GnRH analog or an aromatase inhibitor (AI) + GnRH, the majority of postmenopausal women receive an AI due to its higher efficacy compared to tamoxifen. As the introduction of CDK4/6 inhibitors into the treatment of early-stage breast cancer with a higher risk of recurrence will probably result in a shift in the endocrine treatment landscape, the question is what treatment did potential candidates for CDK4/6 inhibitors in Germany receive before CDK4/6 inhibitors were available. Patients and Methods: As part of a retrospective multicenter analysis, anonymized data were collected of patients with HR+ HER2- early-stage breast cancer who received endocrine therapy in the period between 10/2021 and 03/2022. Potential candidates for CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment were classified into different risk cohorts using the inclusion criteria of the NATALEE and monarchE trials. Results: The data of 238 patients from 29 different centers were analyzed. While 20.6% of patients met the monarchE criteria, the subgroup which met the NATALEE inclusion criteria consisted of 46.2% of patients. 53.8% of patients did not meet the inclusion criteria for either the NATALEE or the monarchE trial. More than half of the patients did not receive chemotherapy. 28.6% of patients in the whole cohort were premenopausal. 67.6% of premenopausal women received neo-/adjuvant chemotherapy. 61.8% of premenopausal patients received tamoxifen as adjuvant endocrine therapy, 19.1% received an AI + GnRH and 10.3% were treated with tamoxifen + GnRH. Conclusion: Despite the high percentage of premenopausal patients who received aggressive treatment in the form of chemotherapy, only one third of premenopausal patients received GnRH in addition to their standard endocrine therapy. Studies carried out at a later point in time and registry studies will be necessary to see how the endocrine therapy landscape in Germany has changed following the introduction of CDK4/6 inhibitors.

Indexed as

aromatase inhibitorbreast cancerendocrine treatmentOFStamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID37942358
PMCPMC10629492
OpenAlexW4384661788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.