Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37942255›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

Reporting reimbursement price decisions for onco-hematology drugs in Spain.

David Elvira, Ferran Torres, Roser Vives, Gemma Puig, Mercè Obach, Daniel Gay, Daniel Varón, Thais de Pando, Josep Tabernero, Caridad Pontes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

David ElviraDepartament de Farmacologia, de Terapèutica i de Toxicologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain.
Ferran TorresBiostatistics Unit, Medical School, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallés, Barcelona, Spain.
Roser VivesDepartament de Farmacologia, de Terapèutica i de Toxicologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain.
Gemma PuigGerència del Medicament, Servei Català de la Salut, Barcelona, Spain.
Mercè ObachSanofi, Paris, France.
Daniel GayGerència del Medicament, Servei Català de la Salut, Barcelona, Spain.
Daniel VarónInstitut Català d'Oncologia, Barcelona, Spain.
Thais de PandoGerència del Medicament, Servei Català de la Salut, Barcelona, Spain.
Josep TaberneroVall d'Hebron Hospital Campus and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain.
Caridad PontesDepartament de Farmacologia, de Terapèutica i de Toxicologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Even using well-established technology assessment processes, the basis of the decisions on drug price and reimbursement are sometimes perceived as poorly informed and sometimes may be seen as disconnected from value. The literature remains inconclusive about how Health Technology Assessment Bodies (HTAb) should report the determinants of their decisions. This study evaluates the relationship between oncology and hematology drug list prices and structured value parameters at the time of reimbursement decision in Spain. Methods: The study includes all new onco-hematological products (22), with a first indication authorized between January 2017 and December 2019 in Spain and pricing decisions published up until October 2022. For each product, 56 contextual and non-contextual indicators reflecting the structured multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) - Evidence-based Decision-Making (EVIDEM) framework were measured. The relationship between prices and the MCDA-EVIDEM framework was explored using univariate statistical analyses. Results: Higher prices were observed when the standard of care included for combinations, if there were references to long-lasting responses, for fixed-duration treatment compared to treatment until progression and treatment with lower frequencies of administration; lower prices were observed for oral administration compared to other routes of administration. Statistically significant associations were observed between prices and the median duration of treatment, the impact on patient autonomy, the ease of use of the drug, and the recommendations of experts. Discussion: The study suggests that indicators related to the type of standard of care, references to long-lasting responders, the convenience of the use of the drug, and the impact of treatment on patient autonomy, as well as contextual indicators such as the existence of previous clinical consensus, are factors in setting oncology drug prices in Spain. The implementation of MCDA-EVIDEM methodologies may be useful to capture the influence on pricing decisions of additional factors not included in legislation or consolidated assessment frameworks such as the European Network for Health Technology Assessment (EunetHTA) core model. It may be opportune to consider this in the upcoming revision of the Spanish regulation for health technology assessments and pricing and reimbursement procedures.

Indexed as

Pharmaceutical PreparationsConsensusCosts and Cost AnalysisHumansSpainPharmaceutical Preparationshealth technology assessmentmulticriteria assessment methodsonco-hematologic pricesprice and reimbursement systemsvalue assessment

Identifiers

PMID37942255
PMCPMC10627880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.