ArticleHeliyon2023
Maximizing energy storage in Microgrids with an amended multi-verse optimizer.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2025-11-24Author Unresponsive · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/B599F7594A9454F0967EC2E2668F68
- Retracted
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microgrids have emerged as a possible alternative to overcome the difficulties of the combined cooling, heating, and power (CCHP) system in power networks. Energy storage devices are vital for the stable and effective functioning of Microgrids. In this paper, a new modified metaheuristic technique, called the Amended Multiverse Optimizer algorithm (AMVOA) is used to suggest a new method of Microgrid design with energy storage. The Multiverse theory notion served as the inspiration for the metaheuristic optimization method known as the AMVOA. The suggested strategy takes into account the load demand, energy storage technologies, and architecture of a Microgrid with renewable energy sources. The goal is to keep the Microgrid's overall cost as low as possible while preserving its dependability and sustainability. To validate the efficiency of the proposed method, two HRES scenarios are put out, the first of which relies on PV, wind, diesel, and battery power, and the second of which uses PV, diesel, and battery power. To validate the superiority of the proposed method, the method has been compared with five state-of-the-art algorithms, including the Evolutionary Algorithm (EA), Modified Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm (MGOA), Improved Gray Wolf Optimization Algorithm (IGWOA), Improved Arithmetic Optimization Algorithm (IAOA), and the original MVOA. The study compares two scenarios: one with wind, PV, diesel, and battery power and the other with only PV, diesel, and battery power. In scenario 1 (Wind/PV/DG/BESS), the AMVOA algorithm achieves optimal results, resulting in a Net Present Cost (NPC) of $299,010 and an energy cost of $0.2309 per kilowatt-hour. The proposed technique successfully integrates 84.86 % renewable energy sources while meeting defined limitations. The optimal sizing for scenario 2 (PV/DG/BESS) is $333,800 with an energy cost of $0.3451 per kilowatt-hour. The AMVOA algorithm outperforms other algorithms in convergence and provides efficient power management. However, further analysis and evaluation are necessary to assess the robustness, practicality, and reliability of the proposed Microgrid configurations. The outcomes show how the suggested AMVO-based strategy may be used to create the best Microgrid architecture with energy storage. The recommended method may be applied as a decision-making tool for Microgrid planning and design, especially for the integration of renewable energy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.