ReviewCureus2023
Artificial Intelligence Applications in the Diagnosis of Neuromuscular Diseases: A Narrative Review.
Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Electronic Devices and Digital Therapeutics in Neuromuscular Diseases: Narrative Review on Current Applications in Patients' Management and Pharmacovigilance.Health care science · 2026Review
- Quantitative Whole-Body Muscle MRI in Adults With Spinal Muscular Atrophy-A Sensitive Tool for Long-Time Evaluation of Disease Progression.European journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Magnetic resonance imaging applications to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis beyond the central nervous system.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Review
- Machine Learning-Based Classification of ICU-Acquired Neuromuscular Weakness: A Comparative Study in Survivors of Critical Illness.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Classification of Muscular Dystrophies from MR Images Improves Using the Swin Transformer Deep Learning Model.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Editorial: Implementing new technologies for neuromuscular disorders.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The accurate diagnosis of neuromuscular diseases (NMD) is in many cases difficult; the starting point is the clinical approach based on the course of the disease and a careful physical examination of the patient. Electrodiagnostic tests, imaging, muscle biopsy, and genetics are fundamental complementary studies for the diagnosis of NMD. The large volume of data obtained from such studies makes it necessary to look for efficient solutions, such as artificial intelligence (AI) applications, which can help classify, synthesize, and organize the information of patients with NMD to facilitate their accurate and timely diagnosis. The objective of this study was to describe the usefulness of AI applications in the diagnosis of patients with neuromuscular diseases. A narrative review was done, including publications on artificial intelligence applied to the diagnostic methods of NMD currently existing. Twelve studies were included. Two of the studies focused on muscle ultrasound, five of the studies on muscle MRI, two studies on electromyography, two studies on amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) biomarkers, and one study on genes related to myopathies. The accuracy of classification using different classification algorithms used in each of the studies included in this narrative review was already 90% in most studies. In conclusion, the future design of more accurate algorithms applied to NMD with greater precision will have an impact on the earlier diagnosis of this group of diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.